13 most popular stories this week:

Builders:

Below is a list in order of the most popular stories of the last week in terms of how many times they were read. Some are fairly new, others a lasting sources of proven information. With 500 stories on Flycorvair.net, we are in need of an index, but until then you can use the search box at the upper right corner and search any word you like, it will generally turn up several stories.

.

———————————————–

.

You can read any story by clicking on the colored title.

.

———————————————-

Home page / Archives

More stats

Complete Engines for Sale

More stats

Getting Started Reference page

More stats

Thought for the day: Getting Started.

More stats

Corvair power for Panther and Sonex reference page

More stats

Planes flying on Corvair Power

More stats

Thought for the day #2 – To the new homebuilder

More stats

Zenith 750 / Corvair reference page, October 2013

More stats

Engine Operations reference page

More stats

Oil Pressure gauge options, oil system notes

More stats

Sun n Fun forums 2014

More stats

Carburetor Reference page

More stats

Zenith 601/650 – Corvair reference page November 2013

More stats

Friday out of shop until 4pm.

Builders:

It’s 2;30 am here, and in another 4.5 hours we will be starting a 1/2 day tour of our CNC machine shops in central Florida. While the day before we leave for a College or an airshow is busy, there is usually a time crunch about 10 days before departure when we get the last round of material into the machine shops, the last parts into the powder coater, and the last orders into the print shop, so the can get picked up a week later just before we depart Florida, In the case of CC#26-Zenith open house ’13, the crunch day is 9/6/13, today. The loop down through central Florida is about 325 miles of driving. I am starting early, (that is why I have been asleep for hours, this is just my clone sitting at the keyboard sipping coffee and typing this) and I am shooting to be back in the shop by 4pm est. I will be in the shop all weekend, If you would like speak on the phone, just call 904 529 0006 or send an email with your number and a good time to call. Looking forward to speaking with each of you.

Blast from the past, winter 2005: Sebastien Heintz, Grace and myself in the Zenith hangar, one of our stops on the 5,000 mile Midwest night school tour. (http://www.flycorvair.com/midwest05.html) Eight and a half years ago, but just looking at the photo brings back a lot of memories of time well spent over the years.  Grace never ages, but just for fun compare Sebastien and I in the 2013 Oshkosh photo below. He looks twice as laid back and I look twice as old.  At least the dog looks good with whiskers.

c79588

Pietenpol Box Spar Construction, 6/27/13

Builders,

About 25% of our builders are Pietenpol guys. Almost all of them subscribe to the printed Brodhead Pietenpol Association newsletter, published by our friends Doc and Dee Mosher. It is an outstanding publication. In my opinion, the quality of the newsletter comes from the fact that Doc is one of only a handful of aviators who hold both the FAA’s highest awards, the Master Pilot and Master mechanic awards. The task of editing other newsletters often falls on a nice guy who is good with websites or graphic arts, but doesn’t have depth of aviation experience. Doc is just the reverse of this. I mention this so that everyone understands my comments here are not a critique of the caliber of the BPA newsletter.  Although Doc is a guy who has worn many hats in aviation, when it comes to producing the newsletter, he adheres to the role of ‘Chronicler, ‘  Which means publishing all the info that people are interested without passing judgment on the concepts. I am in a different position, and I want to draw our Piet builder’s attention to a serious error in a spar testing article in issue 13-03, which is just hitting Piet builders mailboxes this week.

Above is a cross sectional drawing of Pietenpol spars that I took off an internet site. The left and the middle are US Piet spars, on the right is the spar that Piet builders in the UK use. It is an open ‘C’ section. They all work, but they are not interchangeable, because the UK spar is based on moving the lift strut further out, and it’s dimensions are not proven with standard US length lift struts.

In the newsletter, Steve Williamson, a friend of our who is flying a Corvair powered Pietenpol, wrote an article about how he and several other guys built a set of full box spars for his Pietenpol, motivated primarily by trying to save money. In the story, Steve mentions the tests they did, and feels that his tests proved his design. I have met Steve in person a number of times, and he is a good guy, but his work here and the conclusion he is drawing is a based on a huge error.

OK, I can’t sing nor dance, but I know something about aircraft construction. Steve states that the test load they picked was based on the belief that the two spars in the wing pull an equal load in flight, so his test only subjected the spar to 1/4 the gross weight times the load. This is a serious error. Although the spars are the same height, they are not pulling the same load, the front one is doing way more that 50% of the work. The calculation of the percentage of load on a two spar wing has a lot of factors in it, too many to detail here, but follow this: Many classic aircraft have wing cords right around 60″ like a Piet. They often have 31″ spar spacing (The Piet is 29″) and have the spars at 15 and 65% of the cord. I have seen calculations that illustrate that front spar can be pulling 83% of the lift load on classic aircraft. I do not know the exact number on the Piet, and you would even have to know factors on the specific plane like CG location to know exactly, but 50% is way too low a number, and the person who suggested this as a valid test needs to stop offering structural advice to airplane builders.

To compound the issue, Steve only tested the wing to 3 G’s. This is too low to verify anything. That would only be considered to validate the wing to 2 G’s with the traditional 1.5 to 1 factor of safety. When you throw in the incorrect load assumption, you might be down to 1.25 G’s. Now the plane is flying, and I am sure it has already seen more than this, but I want to point out that it is a very dangerous and incorrect to conclude that the test run on the spar proved anything more than this. A lot of factors go into an actual test, I have been part of several of them, both for metal and composite wings. There are very important details like having the spar at the angle of attack that generates the maximum lift, not level. No serious designer draws a conclusion from a 3 G load test. The last test I saw was the Panther wing, and they loaded it to 10 G’s before they felt that it was approved for 6 in flight.

The UK spars of no use to US builders for two reasons. First, they will not sell you the plans for them. Second, they are based on using longer lift struts, and to use them with US length lift struts would invalidate their engineering. Although C section spars obviously can work, if you are going to the work to build this type of spar, you might as well build a full box spar, there are a number of advantages to them.

What is needed is a US based design for a full box spar, based on The Original strut location, a design that takes in to account the actual load and can have this validated in a real test. This is simply not that difficult. Bruin’s analysis of flight vehicles and the values of the wood are all that is needed. The job is greatly simplified by knowing that the original ‘plank’ spar works just fine, so the new box would just have to match or slightly better the strength of the original.

In previous years we did a lot of work to develop a great deal of exact data on Pietenpol weight and balance. By comparison, this is a much smaller project.  After the calculations are done, I will be glad to share the data with Steve, and his wing may prove strong enough for him, but he can make this conclusion based on better info. As a reality check, if you are only going to save 25% on the cost of spars, I don’t think most people would find that worthwhile. Routing the spars saves 16 pounds on the plane, and a well designed set of box spars might only beat this by 5-10 pounds. There is another option, using extruded aluminum spar blanks that look like Piper spars. They take comparatively no work, they are strong and only cost about $100 each. There are a number of options in the long run, but with some work there can be a good box spar option for US builders.-ww

76 Days until Oshkosh 2013.

Builders,

We are now slightly more than 10 weeks from Oshkosh. We will actually be leaving Florida about 70 days from now, as we are going to the Pietenpol Gathering in Brodhead WI on July26-28. Oshkosh is only 80 miles further up the road, we will be setting up there on Sunday the 28 in the afternoon.

Our booth at Oshkosh is in the same place as last year, directly across from Zenith Aircraft in the north display area. We have many things planned for Airventure, including a large Cookout with The Panther crew and a reserved row for Corvair powered aircraft right behind our booth. I will also be giving forums, as I have done for the last 14 years. We are driving up with a trailer full of parts, and we will have almost all of our regular items on hand.

I bring this up to remind builders that if they would like to pick up a large item like a motor mount, at Oshkosh or Brodhead, we will be glad to save you the shipping. I just got enough CNC tubing sets to make four 601/650 mounts and four 750 mounts. We are also planing on bringing one or two Pietenpol mounts. If you are planning on attending either of the two events, and there is anything that you would like to pick up there, please drop us a note and we will get it into the works. -ww

Flycorvair.net passes 200,000 page reads. 5-4-13.

Builders,

Late Friday night, someone decided to read the story about Jim’s twin project. This was the 200,000th page read on this site. We have come to this milestone in 17 months of operation. Three months ago we hit the 150,000 mark. On that occasion I wrote a story that addressed some of my perspectives on writing. The latter part of it falls into the category of ‘plain speaking’ that we hit on about two weeks ago.

FlyCorvair.net breaks 150,000 page reads, 2/6/13. 

That story also speaks about how the statistic probably indicates that 1,500 people read the site 100 times on average. Getting another 50,000 page reads in 90 days means that the Corvair is popular, but isn’t about to displace Rotax as the most numerous engine in the category. In a nutshell, we have enough growth and serious builders to sustain a lot of further development, new parts, new installations, more Colleges and house calls, all without losing the elements of craftsmanship, friendship and shared experience that have always been hall marks of the Corvair movement.-ww

Looking for Piper PA-22 or 22-108 (Tripacer/Colt) part….

Builders:

I am putting a regular windshield back in  our Wagabond in place of the 3 piece one the aircraft originally had. I already have the plexiglass windshield itself, but I do not have the metal strip that goes between the boot cowl and the plexiglass.  I could make this out of fiberglass if I really had to, but I would rather save the time and buy an old piper part. Our wagabond started out life as a 1964 Colt, PA-22-108, but I am pretty sure that the PA22 part would fit it also. If anyone has a friend with a pile of Piper PA-22 parts, I would greatly appreciate asking them if they have a spare one of these.

Thanks in advance,-ww.

 

Mail Sack, 4/23/13, Plain speaking

Builders,

The note on ‘plain speaking’ generated more mail than we have seen in a while. The quality of the thoughts are a real stand out. To my personal perspective, aviation is for thinking people, those that consider and evaluate, then act. The letters written tell me that we have this kind of people at the center of the Corvair movement. Not everyone has to come to the same conclusion or think alike, but the quality of the experience is always better with people who do think.

Several of the letters expressed concern that I might not continue to write quite the same stuff. I am guessing some of this came from my choice of the word ‘defense.’ It might have been more descriptive to say, ‘the value of plain speaking.’ My concern was that new people might be put off by this stuff because it is in such contrast to the things people hear in aviation magazines. And, it is these new people who are most in need of this type of ‘wake up call.’ My concern was that I didn’t want to scare anyone off before they had a chance to read, think and consider the message. Sitting here, it is hard to tell how ‘Joe Smith’ out there reads this. I have feedback in letters, and almost every topic here is something I have said in an in person forum where you gauge how receptive people are. The only things that I don’t cover in forums are the things Like the Ken Terry story because it isn’t the right setting. For this reason, I appreciate all the letters  people sent offering their thoughts on the subject.

I chose not to put the hand full of notes that questioned the series up here for this reason: They are mostly from new people, and there people have probably not been a part of this kind of conversation in aviation before. Where else would they have come across it? Not in the magazines, not at the chain link fence FBO’s, not at Oshkosh and not from the home computer flight simulators. It is my hope that these people will read the letters here from many ‘old school’ aviators and think about why traditional builders find value in this type of conversation. Not printing their notes makes it easier for them to redefine their thinking in our community. 

A few days ago I saw a film that I have found moving since I saw it in the theater 30 years ago, “Tender Mercies.” Near the end of the film Robert Duval’s character gives a very painful speech where he says  “I never trusted happiness, and I never will”, the implication being that happiness in his life has proven to be fleeting, but over time he had come to trust mercy instead. I am nowhere near that extreme, but I will say that I learned a whole lot more about life and the strength of human beings by learning from their adversities and struggles than I ever have by listening to the stories about the good times. -ww. 

 International Aviator of adventure Tom Graziano writes:

“William, People who call what you wrote morbid and not about planes apparently don’t yet fully understand the fact that aviation is a deadly serious business and “is terribly unforgiving of any carelessness, incapacity, or neglect.”

Winston Churchill once remarked:
“The air is an extremely dangerous, jealous and exacting mistress. Once under the spell most lovers are faithful to the end, which is not always old age. Even those masters and princes of aerial fighting, the survivors of fifty mortal duels in the high air who have come scatheless through the War and all its perils, have returned again and again to their love and perished too often in some ordinary commonplace flight undertaken for pure amusement.”— Sir Winston Churchill, ‘Thoughts and Adventures,’ 1932….Tom “

Zenith 750 builder Dan Glaze Writes:

“You just keep writing William, the life you save might be mine. Dont worry what some people might say.Years ago my teenage son was getting into some trouble by hanging out with the wrong type of kids, I made him watch a show called sacred straight on tv. It was a real life prison show. some people thought it was too harsh and morbid, he is now 36 years old and has 3 kids of his own and to this day he claims that show changed his life for the better. Dan-o”

Builder Pete Chmura writes:

“You know what you’re doing. Keep doing it. Pete”

Builder Dan Branstrom Writes:

“Your post reminded me of what one of the American rocket scientists said after the public was disheartened to see so many failures: that much more was learned from their failures than from their successes.”

Zenith 750 builder Blaine Schwartz writes:

“William, Keep the philosophical comments coming! The people, the ideas, and the different perspectives we share is all part of our journey in building and flying what we built and quite rewarding. Consider it a bonus; you get good common sense knowledge about building an engine or plane plus comments that may enhance other parts of your life. I have come away with two of the most thought-provoking phrases from your musings and have shared those with others who were equally “blown away” after contemplating them. The first is your’s: “Real freedom is the sustained act of being an individual.” and the second is from someone who responded to one of your posts by quoting Rabbi Harold Kushner: “I used to admire people who are intelligent; now I admire people who are kind”. We have a world full of mis-information and craziness coming at us all day, every day. Your site is a refreshing departure!”

About the Ken Terry story, builder Jeff Smith writes:

“One of the most moving things I’ve read – thanks Wiliam”

Builder Ryan Michalkiewicz writes:

“William, I’ve enjoyed this series of writings on decision-making. You are telling the stories these lost builders can’t.”

Aero Engineer and Cruiser builder Sarah Ashmore writes:

“Some people will always be “Disturbed” by a frank and open discussion of serious topic. Maybe they want to hide their heads in the sand but experimental aviation, as is all flying, is inherently dangerous. Then again so is driving a car or taking a walk. If we are going to improve our accident rate in experimental aviation we MUST objectively look at the failures of those who have gone before us and determine what they did wrong so we do not do the same things. This is just common sense and such discussions are not morbid. If it offends them then maybe they should give up flying for something safer.”

Builder Charles Nowlin writes:

William, as far as I know, the first amendment is still in effect. However I don’t know of any adjudication  that mandates people read what they don’t like. I say, if it is offensive, troublesome, or, Downright irritating, no one is stopping anyone from copious use of the delete key. I, on the other hand, applaud your efforts at applying the past attempting to prevent future events of a disastrous nature from happening. I see no need for explaining the exercise of your right to free speech. Those that wish to curtail your, and my Right to say what is on our mind, by any of the methods available, need to revisit history and learn a thing or two.Charles Nowlin Houston Tx. US Military, veteran, who only gave “some”, to defend this right.

Charles, Thank you for your service. I understand I have the ‘right’ to say it, (provided by yourself and others) my question was revolving around how to say it, what delivery would reach people who need it. People, like yourself, who have been in very serious settings, value blunt talk. Here we have to speak to some new people, people who have not been in a serious setting, but will be when their plane is done. Today, that mindset change is a big jump for some people. On the subject of listening, I always take the time to hear Veterans out on any topic. It fits with the concept of learning more from a man who has known adversity. My father is a WWII, Korea, Vietnam vet. He came from an era where men didn’t speak about things. When I was young, I can think of only one or two things he ever said about what he saw. Keeping it to himself allowed him to do his duty, but in the long run it didn’t do him any good. He is 87 now. In recent years he has tried speaking much more about things he saw, but it is very difficult for him. Over time he has written at length of things, but most days he can only get 2 or 3 sentences into something he wants to speak of it, before he stops. He is always able to tell you the facts of an event, like how 23 of his high school class mates were killed in a single day. But if he wants to tell you one of their names, or say something about what kind of person they were, this is very hard. I have learned from this bitter lesson.  I still find it hard to speak about Ken Terry, Mike Holey and Ben Mcmillan, but I can write about them and feel better for doing so. Because of my Father, I am much more alert to people who have had to digest more than humans can, and I try to hear them out when ever they need to speak.-ww

Builder Howard Horner writes:

“Thanks for sharing your shop with us and working to keep us safe. I am living in Haiti and miss my shop in Colorado every day. The smell of wood and grease and the smoker out back… the satisfaction in creation…and the conversations with the watchers. But the thing I miss most are the memories lived late early in the morning, of the ones that came and touched me deep and went: Brute the dog, Doug that lost his battle with depression, Mom, and the toddler days with the kids and so many more. I’ve only met you once, but your raw humanity demands I call you friend.-Howard, College 25 (I love the nuts and bolts stuff too!)

Builder Kim Anderson Writes:

“You don’t have to defend yourself……….they have articles every month in AOPA magazine of stupid things we do as pilots, and survive……me included. I hope I make good decisions forever, but you never know.”

Builder Bruce Culver writes:

“No, no, don’t you dare stop writing about your friends and the lessons they can teach us. The philosophy you bring to this enterprise is one of the most valuable things in your writing to me. Anyone can write about the technical stuff, pistons and cranks and 5th bearings, etc. But it is the telling of stories that teaches us about life, and life is what it’s all about. Maturity is accepting that we have faults, and haven’t always done the right thing, or have judged people, or have done other stuff that shouldn’t have been done. It is in accepting that we are flawed that we learn compassion and understanding, and appreciation for the lives of others. These friends of yours are alive to us because of what you have written; in that sense, they live still. And yes, they still have much to teach those who will listen. So, press on – these days we have a shortage of practical philosophers, those who have been in the Arena, who have worked and struggled to achieve. We who read these reminiscences can learn from them, and through the lessons they teach us, we can keep fate from being our hunter, and send him down to the guy in the next hangar, or the next airport, or the next state, the guy who doesn’t respect fate, or the odds of taking chances, who tries to short-sheet the system. Let someone else be the object lesson. That is what you give us, and it’s free, but priceless…..”

601XL Builder/flyer Dr. Gary Ray writes:

“William, I found the stories spiritual and a reminder to me of those that changed my life in a significant way. Sometimes an event, sometimes a role model but once you live it, you are never the same. It did not come off as morbid .. , likely just missed the point. I just lost my mother.
She made me and many others a better person in at least a thousand ways and still, she was a better person than me.”

Dragonfly builder and engineer Guy Bowen writes:

“My take on your reflection of past acquaintances and lessons learned is simply this: one cannot accomplish that task while underscoring the gravity of failure to do proper risk management by simply kind-speak and soft-peddling. Any amount of squishy, feel good sales speak cannot forewarn folks as to the seriousness of loss or express the hollowness of a senseless or avoidable tragedy. Any soul scared off from the experimental endeavor by an expression of truth, often presented in it’s rawest of states, probably should buy off-the-shelf…at least they will have someone to blame when it eventually fails them anyway.

My personal experience has taught me that Sir Isaac’s second law applies to idiots as well as it does to mass: An idiot’s momentum change is proportional to the impulse impressed upon the idiot. Hence: an idiot with momentum will have a linear path unless a truthful impulse acts upon it at some point along the way. The point here is that the impulse of truth, in this equation, is inversely proportional to how the idiot receives the message. If the message is aligned closely to how the idiot want’s to hear it the impulse limit approaches one…if the message diverges from the idiot’s ideal: the impulse has negligible effect approaching zero. I other words: if the message bothers you, and you are an idiot…you will dismiss it as unimportant and continue on your merry way.”

Away at CC#25 and Sun n Fun,

Builders,

We are packing the truck and trailer to leave at 6am for Leesburg and CC#25. We will be there from the 5-7th. We will have one day off, and on Tuesday the 9th, we will start my 25th consecutive year at Sun n Fun. We will have a full commercial display, in booth N-66, which is on the row in front of building “C”, the third of the four main display buildings. This is one row over from where we were last year. Sun n Fun is the second largest air show in the US, and it has been held every spring in Lakeland Florida for many decades. It is a big event, and it draws thousands of planes.

A fun internet story from 10 years ago, and then I will make the connection to the two events we are heading off to:

Here goes: Ten years ago, while we were away on an airshow road trip, away from the computer and unaware of this, a storm started up on the Corvair internet discussion group. A builder, who we knew pretty well, wrote an angry post where 400 other people could read it. The nature of his complaint was that I had done something very careless, that could even jeopardize his safety. He wrote this about the fact that I had sent his a conversion manual that had four pages missing. He had only caught the omission because he had closely looked at the page numbers. He speculated that there might be “critical” information on these pages that he would have never found out about, and my careless ways had left them out, directly putting him and his loved ones at risk.

Another guy wrote back and said that he was angry also, because his manual was also missing pages 122-125. He also agreed that ww was some kind of careless fool to be sending out ‘defective’ manuals. 

A third guy wrote in and said his was missing the same pages. He had a good guess why also. It wasn’t ww being careless, he was definitely hiding something.  Two others wrote in to say that theirs were also missing the same pages, and they both were sure that I was hiding something. The second guy said that he had been tolerant of my long hair to this point, but I was now exposed as the kind of person he had known I was all along.

Before it was done, ELEVEN people wrote in to say that I had left out the pages, and most of them used words like “Demand” and “get to the bottom of this.” I am sure that many others reading this also saw I had left the pages out of their book also, but there was little point in saying more, as ww was certainly done in aviation.

We came back a week later, turned on the computer and read all of this. Do you already know what the answer was? Of course, each one of these people including the people who were sure it was a cover up, had actually ripped the pages out of their manuals themselves. 122-123 was the manual registration page and 124-125 was their liability statement. All of these people had removed them themselves, and mailed them to me. In the middle of a very good conspiracy theory and big expose, they had forgotten that they had done this. I got on the group and pointed this out, and asked them politely if they were concerned about being PIC with this kind of memory issue. 

Actually I forget stuff all the time, it is part of not sleeping enough. The part that I found disturbing was how quickly the lynch mob formed, and how quick people who I had met in person were willing to buy into the “he is hiding something” mentality.  Out of 11 people, came a single apology, and it wasn’t in public like the man’s accusation was.

Here is the connection to today: This type of stuff goes on every time I go to an airshow or a college. I had a guy call twice in one day while we were at CC#24, and then go on a discussion group and ask the question “Is WW still in business?”  Last year, I had a guy tell me that because I went to Oshkosh for two weeks, and he couldn’t get me on the phone, He was certain that I had some type of health issue. He had told his wife that he was sure I “had a stroke.”  I weigh less than 170, I have never smoked a cigarette in my life, I don’t drink, and my father is almost 88 and doing fine. Who think’s I am a candidate for a stroke?

There is nothing I can do to stop people from saying these things. I have resolved myself to accepting that the internet is a great facilitator of hysteria. The only thing I ask is that if anyone reads a post like this, please take a minute to point out that we are at CC#25 and SnF, and that I was not abducted by aliens, I have not had a stroke, and I didn’t leave pages out of anyone’s manuals.

*Lest anyone think I am making up the story above, I have the original posts in a file that I keep on a cabinent out in the hangar. When ever I feel too good about myself, and I start thinking that I have a good ability to communicate ideas with airplane builders, I go out and read it to keep my perspective in check.

Happy Birthday Sterling.

Builders’

If he were alive, Sterling Hayden would have been 96 today. He has been gone for 26 years, but even from the grave he is probably more alive than most men walking around upright.

Hayden-Asphalt.jpg

Sterling Hayden in 1950. He didn’t just look tough, he was. In WWII when other actors defended civilization by making comedies and VD training films, Hayden was an OSS agent fighting with the Joseph Tito and the Partisans in Yugoslavia.

If you are just getting home from work, and spent too much of the day surrounded by spirit-robbing people and things, take a moment to refresh your mindset by reading a little about Sterling Hayden at this link:

Sterling Hayden – Philosophy

Then head out to your shop and put in a few hours of work with your own hands that will set you apart from the  “preposterous gadgetry, playthings that divert our attention for the sheer idiocy of the charade.” Pick up a hand tool and get a hold of your life, do something to make this day count.-ww

Kitplanes Clarification

Builders:

Kitplanes magazine covered alternative engines in an article that was released a few days ago. Dan and Rachel Weseman asked that I clarify a misunderstanding from the article. As it appears, some people thought I was implying that I had developed all the things I mentioned. My intention was only to highlight developments in the Corvair movement in general. Although anyone reading my Web site knows the following, I will just say it here plainly:

I had nothing to do with the development of the Weseman billet crankshaft. Dan and Rachel have kept the manufacturer’s ID private, and I do not even know who they are.

I had nothing to do with the design nor development of the Panther either.

I have assembled engines with the billet crank, and can attest they are great pieces. I helped Dan with some small tasks on the Panther, but nothing more than anyone would do for a friend building a plane, nothing he couldn’t have done himself. Really, my sole contribution in either of the above was to say positive things about the work of friends.

Dan also pointed out that I have a long history of illustrating out how LLCs are used by bad people in our industry to evade responsiblity. He thought it would be fair if I pointed out that LLCs also serve the function of protecting good people from frivolous legal action. Dan and Rachel have their work under a LLC, and would like people to hear about the positive side, that many good, successful firms in our industry are organized this way. My goal was not to demonize LLCs, but to get builders to develop their own “buyer beware” attitude. In the end, smart people already knew this, and bargain hunters who didn’t care who they dealt with were not swayed by anything I wrote, so the writing probably had little or no effect anyway.

To avoid future misunderstandings of this sort,  builders should just get their information directly from Dan and Rachel. It is their hard work, and it’s obviously best explained by them. I am still a big fan, it’s great stuff, but we can just read about it on their own site, http://flypanther.net/ 

-ww