Mail Sack 10-3-12

Friends,

I write a lot about motivation and philosophy, and most of the stuff rarely generates email, but if I write a piece that sounds cranky, people write in response.  Below, a few thoughts from builders. keeping in mind that independent, intelligent people often see things from a different angle, I rarely expect builders to see eye to eye on perspectives, and it worth including that I am often more entertained by people I disagree with than people who see a subject the same way. I am open-minded, notice that “Guy A” gets the last word on the subject with his own letter.I wrote a long detail piece on plugs a few months ago, to read it type the words “Spark Plug Woody Harris” in the search block on the above right.

At the very bottom is a very thoughtful letter from Harold Bickford on the article Mastery or ?. Well worth reading -ww 

—————————————————————

From builder Matt Lockwood:

Good points (pardon the pun). Speaking for myself, I have learned tremendously from you, WW, thanks for being a pioneer.

———————————-

From 601 Builder/pilot and DVM Gary Ray:

“You are not alone.
I have seen similar behavior in my profession. If West Nile virus is reported in the press then all animals that die in the next year were one of the unlucky ones that got it. Or if the Chinese contaminate dog and cat food with sawdust, then all animals that die of kidney failure must have been poisoned even though no toxic agent has been found, no animal gets sick when deliberately fed the suspected food, millions of animals that have eaten it have perfectly normal health and blood work, and none of the tissue damage found on necropsy of animals that die is related to other cases. Or, when a client states that they think their cat is responding poorly to a vaccine that he got two months ago and it is making him sick, they are not convinced by me when I tell them that the tire imprint on the white-haired abdomen probably has more to do with his current problem. “

——————————————————————————

From west Coast Pietenpol builder Pete Kozachik:

“Hi William, I’m having a Dickens of a time with your tale of two spark plugs; seems I used the wrong gap on my test run some time ago. The last line in your piece calls for .016″, but I used the 1965 Corvair Shop Manual’s spec, .030″. I used AC-R44F plugs, and ran the test using high octane no-lead gas as prescribed. What gap should I have used under those conditions? Same as for 100LL? One thing I noted after the run was some wet(?) soot on one plug, which I figured was due to any number of things, but not the wrong gap. What’s your diagnosis? Best wishes, Pete”

Pete, I included your note here in case anyone else read the story and got a detail wrong: .016″ is a gap that is correct for a magneto ignition, as on the Franklin in part “B”. Corvair should have a gap of .035″ and use ACR44F plugs.  Other ones work, but if anyone wants old reliable, this is the best set, especially if you are trying to track down any kind of issue of experimenting with some other variable. We soot on a plug on a first run is often assembly oil from the engine’s build up.-ww

————————————————————-

From Builder Mr. Jaksno:

“Sorry to hear this. Aviation does not suffer fools. The rant was well deserved, AND instructional. Thank you for being a ‘Lifeguard’. And thanks for being the Godfather of Corv-air!”

If you read the letter from Guy A you will see he is a pretty good cat, just missed it on the plug issue. A lifeguard will rescue people, (I tried it once, worked, but I promised Grace that I would let professionals and those clad in asbestos extract trapped people next time.) Just think of me as a guy standing on the beach pointing out where the rip tide you can’t see is. -ww

—————————————————

From Builder Bruce Culver:

“Don’t that make your brown eyes blue…..?”

———————————————

And a response from the ever mysterious “Guy A” Himself, with whom I had a very pleasant 25 minute phone call today. If I ever sound cranky in email, it’s probably an attempt at humor gone bad. There is little between friends that can’t be fixed with a phone call……Guy A is obviously a thoughtful guy who considers risk management seriously, he just missed a basic important point on his engine.

I (Guy “A”) had night of introspection, and not much sleep, after reading this over a few times. I know that I’m *not* a taker of unmitigated risks, as you might infer. Instead, like nearly all long-time pilots, I recognize that flying, especially flying an airplane I built-in the garage with an engine not originally designed for a plane, is an inherently risky activity. And I believe that the risk can be reasonably managed through precise construction and maintenance, well thought-out testing, careful operation, and learning from the experience (and mistakes) of others.
I retorque my wooden prop at every oil change, and I do those at short intervals recognizing that Rotella-T and a $6 oil filter are not expensive compared to the engine. I have two batteries and an alternator in my electrically dependent airplane, and every year at annual, I put in a fresh battery in the #1 spot and move the #1 battery to the #2 spot, so that I always have at least one battery that less than year old. The manufacturer says the batteries should last 6 years, but what’s a battery worth when you’re in the clouds, an hour from the closest airport, and the alternator belt breaks?
I change my tires before they’re bald. I use flight following whenever I can and file flight plans when I can’t. I check the weather before I fly, every time, and I talk to Flight Watch a lot when it doesn’t look good. I use carb heat at low power whenever it’s below 75 degrees, even if I know the relative humidity is 20%. I attend FAA safety meetings regularly, because that one minute reminder of something I’m supposed to know might make the difference, making the two-hour presentation worth the time.
When I had a certified plane, I only used the specified plugs, and I cleaned, gapped and rotated them on a regular basis. So how did it happen that I flat-out “missed” the *requirement* to use the right plug with the proper gap in my engine?
I could try to explain that the plugs I used *are* listed in the spark plug cross references, and that I ground tested a range of supposedly acceptable heat plugs, found no apparent differences and stuck with the middle of the range. I could note that I’ve flown probably 400 of the 500 hours on my plane with those plugs. I could mention that modern cars with computerized adaptive ignitions are much less sensitive to particular plug heat and gap, so it wasn’t on my mind.
But all that would just be underlining the remarkable strength and robustness of the Corvair design. During all those hours, I was probably getting less-than-optimal performance and building up lead deposits on the valves. And a choice to use conservative timing (about 28 degrees max advance), in case I had to run on auto fuel, probably kept me from seriously damaging the engine.
So I’m just going to say, “I missed it, and messed up.” My bad. Experimental aviation is supposed to be a long journey of learning, and now I’ve learned this one,Luckily, no metal got bent and no one got hurt. ACDelco R44F plugs, gapped .035-.040. Got it.
Final note – If you also cannot find these plugs in your local auto parts store, try Rock Auto on-line (www.rockauto.com) for the best price.

————————————————————————————

On the subject of Mastery or ?  Builder Harold Bickford wrote:

William,

It seems to me that when you build something from components or better yet from basic materials you have to learn about craftsmanship, patience, accuracy and so forth. By it’s very nature homebuilding is not instant gratification and that is a good thing in a society that seems to want things right now for little or no cost. It is better to invest yourself and learn than to simply have someone else say “this is the airplane you want”.

Certainly part of the building adventure has been to visit and work with a fellow Piet builder. He ultimately chose an O-200 which he rebuilt. The Corvair engine mount he had is now in my shop along with a Corvair engine on an engine stand that will be torn down when it gets colder Meanwhile the wood for the fuselage is ready for cutting and framing up while we still have nice temperate days. True it is labor intensive (and we are on a budget) but the point is that when done the Piet will be a known quantity and at virtually every point Edi and I will be able to say “we built that”.

Harold

 

 

A Tale of Two Spark Plugs……

Friends,

“They were the best of plugs and they were the worst of plugs; It depended solely on which engine you screwed them in. Applications be damned, to hell with gaps! We’ll run what we like and blame the results on GM and William Wynne”

……The following story is true, the names have been changed to protect the guilty…………

Guy “A”, Sends several notes, calls etc. Reports his engine is running poorly after a number of hours. He is a technical kind of guy, interested in concepts like lean of peak operation, analysing performance, fuel additives, etc. We run through a pile of different possibilities. Thinking that it must be something that troglodyte ww did, he gets inside his distributor and starts changing stuff to see if he can cure an intermittent hard miss on climb out. It doesn’t do anything. (but mess up the distributor)

Along the way, It is discovered that one cylinder is blowing 50/80 on a compression test. This is now the new suspect for Guy “A.” He is sure of it. I carefully explain that a leaking exhaust valve will not produce an intermittent miss. I go in to explain that even if the engine had 40 over 80 on a differential compression test, this in no way is indicative that cylinder is producing 1/2 power.  Even if a cylinder indicates this low, I seriously doubt that any more than 2% of the flammable air fuel charge escapes past the leak in operation. Just think about how short a period of time the compression stroke is on an engine turning 3,000 rpm.

After all kinds of communication and tests, some how we stumble over spark plug gaps and Guy “A” casually says he gapped the plugs correctly at .025″. I ask why on earth he would do this? Guy “A” feels that this is the correct gap for reasons he cannot explain. A moment later he reveals that he has NGK spark plugs in the engine! He thinks they are great plugs. I agree, pointing out that I always liked them in two-stroke dirt bikes, but that has nothing to do with Corvair engines in aircraft. I ask how he decided which NGK to use, he tells me he tried several, and it ran best’ on the one he picked out. (I wonder to myself how badly it detonated when he found the plug that was too hot.)

Guy “A”  Complains that they don’t sell AC-R44F plugs in his local auto parts store. He goes on-line and finds out that the correct plug we tell people to use cost a whopping $1.44 a plug, far less than the incorrect ones he is using. He goes back and regaps his plugs while waiting for the correct ones, and Volia! intermittent miss gone (at least on the side of the ignition he didn’t mess with.) Today he sends me a picture of the incorrect plugs, he has 83 hours on them. The includes the opinion that they “look pretty good.” I point out that they are the worst looking plugs I have seen in a while. His return question is what is wrong with his motor that it makes the plugs dirty? HOW ABOUT THIS: ITS THE WRONG PLUG FOR THE ENGINE, AND IT HAD A GAP THAT WAS CORRECT FOR A LAWN MOWER.

Trick question: A guy tells you that he has been driving Corvairs for 25 years, he knows engines real well and he has had great results with NGK plugs in his Corvair. They are great to use right? WRONG. Don’t take advice from car guys. Show me the car guy who runs is car on 100LL all the time and cruises at 75 HP. A 1965-69 Corvair will break 100 mph on 75 applied HP. It is not valid data, it doesn’t apply. You can’t show me a land based corvair that only fills up at airports and always drives at 100 mph. 

Here is my major problem, at Guy “A”‘s airport, a lot guys have watched his engine do this intermittent miss on many, many take offs while Guy “A” has been ‘testing.’  Do you think that each and every one of them will now be made to understand that the root of all of Guy “A”‘s issues is caused because he willfully ignored the correct plug for his engine, and then made up a new gap? No way, I am sure that the lesson that each of these people learned is “Car engines suck, Corvairs are bad, they are promoted by a fool, Since guy “A” has a PhD in engineering, if he couldn’t figure it out, no regular builder could.”

My second major problem is with anyone who has an issue with their engine, and the very first thing they decide is “It must be something William did or sold to me.” Statistically speaking, the last 50 times some one jumped to this conclusion, it was something they were doing 49 times. I don’t mind questions, but I do mind the assumption that I don’t know what I am doing, especially when it comes from a person who isn’t even willing to follow my spark plug recommendations. Think it over, Civility is a two-way street. Would you like me if I went to your place of work and always started communications with the assumption that suggestions you made are not worth following and the work you produce is the root of all my issues. How long are you going to be civil with me?

I like teaching people what we have painstakingly learned. Mistakes are ok, we can correct them, but let me point out that this entire wild goose chase was avoidable. It was caused by an attitude problem, a perspective that asking some people on the net and guessing was technically just as valid as all the reasearch, testing and operational data that I have gathered since 1989. -ww

PS: Lest anyone think I am just picking on Guy “A”, let me share a story of Guy “B”. Guy  “B” is an old friend, and he owns a certified aircraft with a 150 hp Franklin, (Which has magneto ignition.) He is not an a&P , but does some Pilot preventive maintenance on it. When it is cool, it runs fine, but after a while, it runs poorly. Winter weather leads him to understand that he must have carb ice. This goes on for several flights, some of which almost end up as forced landings. Everything is considered the culprit, even the basic Franklin design. Steve Upson, old member of the ‘hangar gang’, and very stubborn mechanical detective makes it his personal mission to figure it out. After a long day, he asks the operator about the kind of work he did. He goes into how he cleaned the plugs and gapped them at .035″ Steve points out that this is more than two times the limit allowable. Owner chimes in that it works on all his cars. Steve asks how long he has had Bendix mags on all of his cars. Plug gaps corrected to .016″ plane flies perfectly.

 

 

CC #23 Redux Part I

Friends,

It has been a very busy season. Starting with CC#22 in Texas, then Sun n Fun, then CC#23 in Florida, Brodhead and Oshkosh, and the Zenith open house, we have put in a lot of work and travel beyond our regular production schedule. Along the way we have updated builders with the essential news, but I don’t have the same time to write that I do in the winter season. Consequently we are going to have a few retospective pieces from events of this season covered now. If you were not there, get a good look at the builders in the photos and honestly ask yourself if you were part of enough fun in the 2012 flying season. If the answer is probably not, then the solution is five weeks away in Barnwell SC, where we will be holding Corvair College #24.  Below are a handful of photos we took at CC#23 this summer. We already covered engines that were built at the event, but Colleges are far more than a count of running engines. They are a story of builders making friends and progress at all levels. #23 was a medium-sized event, the first in its location, held in a hot season. #24 is different, it is a third year event, which has always had excellent, if cool weather. We already have more people signed up for #24 than attended #23 total.  While smaller colleges fill a vital role of getting people into the movement, Big events like #24 have a decided productivity advantage, draw more corvair powered planes, and have more people to meet. Our local host PF Beck and his crew do an outstanding job of organization, and I am looking forward to #24 with anticipation of fun and productivity.  Get a look at these picture of good times from #23 and decide today that you will not miss out on #24.

Above, most of the gang from #23. In the background, Jim and Rhonda Weseman’s Celebrity biplane. The City of Palatka rented us the 60×70 hangar for a week for the event, a decision that confirmed their support of innovative ideas at their location.

Above, Rhonda and Jim, and a better look at their plane. It has a 3100cc Corvair, and of course, one of their 5th bearings.  Both Jim and Rhonda know a lot about aircraft construction, Jim is an IA and had a long career in US Navy piston engine maintenance. They work out of their hangar and produce very fine Corvair baffling kits and the sheet metal portion of our Zenith cowls. This said, I personal think that their greatest contribution to aviation is Dan, their son sitting in the cockpit of their plane. This was a very nice family moment.

Above, Corvair Waiex builder Greg Crouchley, stands with Grace and ScoobE at the College. Greg is headed to #24 to assemble and run a 3000cc Corvair with the best of all parts, including a new billet made in the USA crankshaft, a Weseman Bearing, Falcon Heads and all our Gold conversion parts. The build will be one of the centerpieces of learning experience at #24. Note Scoob E’s name badge, a souvenir of attending CC#17.

Above, four of the people who worked to make the modern Corvair movent: Mark Petinunas of Falconmachine.net,  Dan Weseman, yours truely, and Spenser Gould. Spenser worked with us on a number of CAD and enginnnering projects, mostly on the gold series of components and our 5th bearing. His day job is working for Pratt-Whittney in south Florida. In the forground is his 2700cc Dan bearing engine destined to power his unique design, the SP-500. The engine was assembled at #23 and ran like a banshee. 

Above, Grace stands between Albert and Dan Glaze. If you look at the coverage a few days ago of the Zenith open house, you can see another photo of these two. Going back and looking a previous colleges, they appear and almost all of the last half-dozen. Dan’s engine ran at #20, but the keep heading back to events to help out and have a good time. 2013 will bring colleges #25, 26 and 27. #25 is slated for California, probably in Chino in May. #26 is open-ended, but in all likelihood #27 will be back at Barnwell.  Today is a very good day to decide that you are going to get what you always wanted out of experimental aviation.  Deciding to attend CC#24 is how progress is made and motivation is found. Years ago, Dan decided to attend a College, and his progress on his engine and CH-750 really began to move forward. Albert and Dan have already signed up for #24. With a good winter and spring of work, they will return to Barnwell in 2013  to attend #27 also, but the will arrive in style in Dan’s 750. It all starts with the decision that today is a good day to do something decisive. -ww.

The link to the registration is: https://corvaircollege.wufoo.com/forms/corvair-college-24-registration/

Trucks vs. planes

Friends,

Below are a few paragraphs, that are on the surface, a story about a pickup truck and an engine. A consumer perspective guy who comes to this page looking for an inexpensive engine to buy may read a few words here and wonder why this might be on an aircraft blog. However, people attracted to the Corvair movement because they are looking for an engine to power their homebuilt, an engine that will allow them to develop their own skills and experience, and become their own expert, all in the company of like-minded builders, this story will offer some thoughts on the value of simplicity, being willing to learn and get your hands dirty, and prioritizing things in life so that your dreams don’t get sidelined by the things society feeds you on a conveyor belt of mass marketed consumer products…… 

Above, a 1986 C-20 pick up that we bought in Atlanta on the way back from the Zenith open house. I found it on Craig’s list. It is low miles and rust free and has a $3,000 paint job on it. The owner sold it to us for $2,000 because it ran very poorly and was almost impossible to get the 4 speed to shift. Many people had looked at it when it was advertised for twice as much, but were all scared off. In 5 minutes of looking at it, Vern and I spotted that it had Ford plugs in it and the clutch slave cylinder was not bled. After paying for it, I limped it to a nearby auto parts store, changed the plugs and wires for $30 and it ran perfectly. I read the manual that came with the truck which said the slave cylinder had to be bled off the truck. Instead, I had Vern step on the clutch while I jammed a 1×2 between the fork and the bell housing. When he released the pedal, this forced the cylinder to suck in pure fluid from the reservoir. Not textbook, but I understood how the system works, and guessed this would do the job. I pulled the board out, and the clutch worked perfectly. We drove the 400 miles back to Florida at 65 mph, the new truck ran flawlessly and got 14.9 mpg. I end up with a good truck because neither the previous owner, nor any of the people who looked at it, were willing to read some basic directions and get their hands dirty. The repair task didn’t require much experience nor insight. The fundamental difference was that all other parties were operating with a consumer mindset, and Vern and I arrived with the perspective of builders.

I drive trucks like this for several reasons. First, I detest unnecessary complexity in life. 1986 is the last year that GM trucks didn’t have computers and electronic controls on everything. These are some of the last vehicles that can always be fixed with basic tools and will not turn off like a light switch when the EFI or computer quits. Second, they are very cheap. This is my third 1986 Chevy. In the last 14 years the two previous ’86’s I owned covered more than 200,000 miles for a total price of $3,950. I was never stranded once, and only did modest maintenance. The things that would have been trouble, I caught on ‘preflight’ and corrected. I didn’t pay a single dollar for anyone to work on them.

Consider that a person with a typical new truck payment would have spent more than $100,000 in the same 168 months. We all have to make our own choices, but if you can resist buying a new vehicle, you can afford to build a very nice homebuilt aircraft, pay for first class flight instruction, and rent a hangar for the same money over time. While the money is important, the single most vital part of older trucks to me is the independence I have. I am not beholden to the warranty people, the service managers, or other mechanics. When I get in one of these vehicles, I am its mechanical master. Even if the concept doesn’t have full appeal to you in land based transportation, I can make a great case that it pays large dividends to bring this same approach to your homebuilt aircraft, and choosing Corvair power is one of the very few paths that will free you from dependency on the importer, sales people, proprietary parts, and LLC’s with short life spans. Many people never think of homebuilding in these terms, but the freedom and self-reliance that are at the core of homebuilding to me are not available as a consumer product. They are a destination you arrive at by exercising your mind and your hands to learn and create something for yourself. 

I found the above photo on our Flycorvair.com website from the January 2008 update. The original caption is below in blue. It’s funny to think that I have now had red, white and blue versions of the same truck.

“Aircraft Financing 101
Above, Dan Weseman, Gary Coppen and myself ready my old Blue Truck for its trip to the metal salvage yard. People often ask how we afford to build airplanes. This is a good visual example of an easy answer: Grace and I do not spend money on new cars. The flashpoint for the modern popularity of the Corvair/KR combination was the 1999 KR Gathering at Lake Barkley, Ky. This was the first Corvair event Grace attended. Before the trip, I paid $1,500 for my 1986 GMC Blue Truck. It had 160,000 miles on it. Going to the recycler, it has just shy of 300,000. I towed it there by its replacement, The White Chevy Pickup, another 1986 .”

Although all of the trucks have been equipped with 350 small block V-8s, I am prepping a different engine to install. In a few months I will be 50 years old. Assuming I am going to be driving for another 25 years, I plan on doing it with this engine in a 1986 pickup. Why? because in the next 25 years I have a lot of planes I want to build and fly, places to go people to meet and moments to have. All of which will primarily made possible by not spending vast sums of money on new vehicles than I do not wish to own. The engine I am adapting is part of a legendary family of power plants that have been made (with a few refinements) for 75 years.

Above, The last truck engine I will have, A Detroit Diesel 3-53T Removed from a road grader. Detroits have been in production since 1938. They are a two-stroke diesel with exhaust valves.  In Detroit parlance, the first digit is the number of cylinders, the second is the amount of cubic inches per cylinder, thus this engine is 159 cid. Sounds small, but it makes more than 300 foot pounds of torque at 1,600 rpm. Notice that this engine has a turbocharger, feeding a supercharger, feeding the engine. The engine is a 1977 model, it has 5,600 hours on it. That isn’t much because 53 series Detroits can go 20,000 hours between overhauls. I am mating this engine to a New Venture 4500 5 speed then installing it in the pickup. In spite of the fact that Detroits are loud and smoky, this is a far more ‘green’ vehicle than a prius, because it is made of 100% recycled parts, (which were all made in America.) Detroits come in 53, 71, 92, and 149 cubic in cylinder sizes, and configurations from 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 cylinder in lines and Vee engines up to 24 cylinders. They are also made in bigger versions with individual cylinder displacements to 710 cubic inches and versions with 20 of these cylinders. They are known around the globe as engines of simple construction and maintenance, and incredible durability. They powered WWII landing craft, trucks, tanks, armored vehicles, Greyhound busses, construction equipment, etc. PBR’s in Vietnam used 6V-53s and the legendary 44′ USCG motor lifeboat had 6-71s The 12V-71 “buzzin’dozen” is considered among the best truck engines ever built.  You Tube has countless videos to acquaint new ears to the melodious sounds that earned the nick name “Screaming Jimmy.”

Here is the connection to your Corvair: Detroit Diesel was a complete division of General Motors. The design team that developed them was led by the most brilliant automotive engineer of all time, Charles Franklin Kettering. Only a few years lapsed between Kettering’s leadership of engine R&D and the design of the Corvair. Al Kolbe, the lead engineer on the Corvair was certainly a disciple of Kettering’s. The 53 series and the Corvair were designed at the same time, by the same company, using the same R&D resources, likely with people working in the same labs. This is why it is an absolutely ludicrous suggestion that GM, the worlds largest corporation at the time, didn’t have the ability to design the Corvair in-house and had to turn to a nazi like Ferdinand Porsche for help. People who spread these myths are often fans of all things imported, and have bought into an emotional belief of ‘superior’ engineering from other lands. Every country on this planet has things to be very proud of and Americans don’t hold a monopoly on good mechanical designs. But, It is very important to see that people who are convinced that people “over there” have some mystical ability to always make better things are also very prone to seeing themselves as less capable, or a product of a lesser set of people. This is a perspective of a spectator, and it doesn’t get you far in homebuilding. 

In the last two decades I have been working with Corvairs and sharing this work with other homebuilders I have always promoted the original EAA motto of “Learn build and Fly.” In the Corvair movement, these themes are the reason why Corvair builders find homebuilding more rewarding than people who approach it as another consumer experience. The majority of the people who put a plane together in their hangar, end up with little more than a plane in their hangar. There is a lot more to be gained by the experience of homebuilding than simply acquiring an aircraft. At its very best, the experience rewards you with a tremendous amount of learning, a deeply changed perspective on what you personally are capable of, a real understanding that you can be self-reliant on the most serious of subjects, and knowledge that there is a real satisfaction in life when you really get free from all the things other people told you were required. Learn these things, and you really have something well worth all the hours and treasure. The plane sitting in the hangar will merely be the physical representation of the changes you brought to your own life. It’s a big list, but you don’t have to do it alone. People who think this way are not the majority of people in homebuilding, and who knows, maybe we never were. But it isn’t majority rule, it’s all about finding out what is right for you.  If you have yet to find your ‘home’ in homebuilding, consider signing up for Corvair College #24 and come meet many people who have found their place. -ww