Mail Sack, 6/17/13, various topics.

Builders, here is a sample of the mail:

On the topic of  Flathead Ford,  71 cid. Freedom to pursue happiness.

Note: Factual data from an aviator at the scene is more valuable than an opinion from a self admitted ‘jackass’. With this in mind, I gladly print the letter below from Steve Bryan. My brother-in-law, Col. Nerges pointed out that some of my rhetoric may sound intolerant to people who have not met me.  Builders should know that even my closest friends don’t agree with 50% of my perspectives, it isn’t a requirement. The original story is mostly aimed at getting builders to think and consider, and come to their own perspective. I hope that US builders understood that the story has two main points; The UK has a lot of aviation history and mechanical cleverness that I am a big fan of, and We have it very easy here as far as aircraft building goes. Steve is the lead example of a Corvair in the UK system, and the ‘approval’ is based on some data from his project. He is a good guy trying to pick up the responsibility for the slow progress, but I think that it would be reasonable LAA to accept US data on the engine, not require an individual to personally re-develop it.-ww

U.K.  Pietenpol builder Steve Bryan writes:

Hi William, Apologies for being a little late in commenting on your take on what we refer to the ‘nanny state’ here in the UK. You make some valid points, but as a Brit, I felt I ought to respond!

Firstly, I think you have been unlucky to find an organization that is unwilling to sell anything to customers in the USA. I can understand why you got upset by their attitude, which presumably prompted you to get the other things off your chest! Let me know if you would like me to buy a starter for you and I’ll be happy to help.

Regarding the Corvair flight engine issue, the main reason why there are currently no Corvairs flying here is not that they are ‘illegal’ but is primarily due to the miserable rate of progress I’ve made with my Pietenpol project in the last 10 years (which has enjoyed the full support of Francis Donaldson throughout). As the first guy to register the intention to use a Corvair engine in my aeroplane here in the UK, I should really be held responsible for the current situation. In my defence (and without looking for any sympathy!) I have gone through a divorce, followed by the sudden death on my daughter, which took me a little while to come to terms with. I then devoted time to finding myself a new partner and then renovating our house. Since I purchased the core engine from you in 2003, I have also torn it down twice, once to have the crankshaft nitrided and recently to fit a Dan Weseman 5th bearing. I know that you will agree that both of these updates were worth doing, even if I had to save for a while to afford Dan’s excellent bearing kit. Currently I am waiting for a friend to complete the final welding on the engine mount frame (which has full LAA/Francis Donaldson design approval) before I mount the engine on the completed fuselage. I even have the alloy sheet in stock for the cowlings!

Why does Francis Donaldson keep getting a mention here? I have to admit that I’m a little envious of the Experimental system for home-built aircraft you have in the USA, but the reality is that here in the UK the Civil Aviation Authority (equivalent to your FAA) have authorised the Light Aircraft Association to ‘oversee’ homebuilt aircraft and issue them with ‘permits to fly’ on completion. How this works in reality is that you buy your kit/plans, register the project with the LAA and contact your closest LAA Inspector who (usually for free) inspects and signs off the build stages and mentors the rookie builder through the transition from novice to competent craftsman. However, if you decide to modify your aircraft (like fitting a different type of engine) then this ‘mod’ has to be vetted and approved by the LAA. Francis Donaldson is the Chief Engineer at the LAA, so he is in the unenviable position of being responsible to some degree for the airworthiness of the entire UK fleet of homebuilt and historic aircraft, hence his understandably cautious approach on occasions.

Regarding the subject of the Pietenpol here in the UK, it’s true that it’s easier to use the LAA ‘approved’ plans, which include modified wing spars and undercarriage designed by Jim Wills (who was not a government professional, but one of the early UK Pietenpol builders). These plans tend to be favoured here, not because they produce an aeroplane which is better than the original, but because they increase the ‘approved’ gross weight of the aeroplane to 1250lb. Given that in order to fly safely from our short fields and in more congested airspace, we usually build in seat-belts, radio, engines at the more powerful end of the Pietenpol range and we are not all as lightweight as BHP then this extra weight margin is useful. The rights to these revised plans are currently still held by Jim Wills and I understand that you are correct that he prefers not to sell them in the USA. I guess he has his reasons. Maybe he is related to the guy selling the old Ford parts!

Cheers, Steve Bryan (very slow UK Pietenpol builder).

Builder  Steve S. writes:

OK William…..Worked on one of these as a teenager!  You are dead on about Old Blighty.  My English friends say England is politically doomed.  Very good and hope to read more from You.

500+ hr. Zenith 601 builder/flyer Andy Elliott writes:

Just got my clean used copy of Stick & Rudder in the mail today, for a total of <$11, including shipping.  It’s the 1944 version, but I think it’s the 29th printing.  Dust jacket is still in one piece, and there was a Private Pilot magazine subscription coupon in it for a book mark. Private Pilot stopped publishing in 2005, but you can tell from the “3 years for $19” subscription price that this coupon is older than that!

Pietenpol builder Dave Aldrich writes:

Hi William, If you really want a starter for your Anglia, one of my good friends is English and travels across the pond on a regular basis.  He’d be happy to bring one back.  I’ve got his cousin looking for a good Series II Land Rover (think Hatari) for use up here in Maine so the starter would be simple.

As an aside on Anglias, many years ago in my misspent youth in upstate New York, I used to race cars on ice.  At the time, I was a poor starving college student and my one and only car was a 1959 SAAB 93 that had a 2 cycle, 3 cylinder engine displacing a massive 750ccs.  It was just about the only front wheel drive car available beside the Oldsmobile Toronado and was a hoot to drive on ice.  One of the guys who raced with us must have been your older brother since at various times he had a Corvair powered Karmann Ghia and a SAAB with a Buick V-6 stuffed under the hood.  Now we get around to the Anglia connection.  One of my good friends actually had a job and could afford a dedicated ice race car.  For $50, he bought a 1958 (I think) Anglia, the one with the reverse tilted rear window, and we tried to improve it’s performance by spending our summer evenings drinking cheap beer and tinkering.  Speed parts for that engine were non-existent so we just milled the head, cobbed some headers together, and waited for Lake George to freeze over.  After a couple of years of banging fenders with other like minded loonies, the Anglia finally gave up.  We were flat towing it back home when one of the tow bar attachments gave out.  Our faith in the integrity of the frame was somewhat misplaced.  The safety chain kept the tow bar in the parade but the car wasn’t so lucky.  We turned and the Anglia didn’t.  It just twisted the remaining attachment point off.  Fortunately only a ditch and telephone pole were in the way and we were only a couple of miles from its home so the Niskayuna police were unaware of the adventure.  I consider that we were in the vanguard of the American racing scene since we actually had a 3 car “team” in the manner of the Europeans like Ferrari, Porsche, Jaguar, and so on.  This was long before the Hendrich/Rousch/Penske juggernauts that came later.  We had to dissolve Fubar Racing team when one of the guys got transferred to New Jersey, I joined the military and the others grew up.-Dave

Zenith 601xl builder Oscar Zuniga writes:

I live on this side of the pond, I like airplanes, and I was at the hangar this afternoon for a while to look at my collection of Corvair cases to see if any are candidates for some R&D that Dan Weseman may be doing.  However, everyone of interest on my family tree is dead and gone, so I can’t thank them for coming to this country so I could be born here and enjoy the privileges and freedom to experiment, build, and fly.  My grandpappy on my mother’s side was Scots-Irish of the common but industrious sort, and my other three grandparents came here from Mexico, descended from Spanish stock who crossed the pond from Spain to Mexico for conquest.  My guess is that they didn’t find the fountain of eternal youth, but there were also no Corvair cores to be found there either ;o)  I have aviation friends on many continents of the world and can completely corroborate the fact that, compared to those in other countries, we enjoy aviation freedoms that are almost beyond belief.

.

On the topic of  Model T of the air?

Zenith 650 builder Becky Shipman writes:

You are not opinionated if you:

Base your position on data and facts (F still equals ma, for example) Recognize and state your biases (Should be cheap, easy to understand, reliable, for example) Are willing to change your position when more data becomes available

You’re also allowed to have personal preferences.  I run into this with instruments.  As I’m searching for used instruments, I have come to the conclusion that my limited appetite for scrounging and the need to recondition the critical ones means I could save time and weight (maybe not money) by getting a low-end EFIS.  But I like steam gauges – they are easy to read and trend with a glance and I know enough about how they work to figure out when one might be giving me a bad reading.  They also look cooler.  But I wouldn’t say that someone who installs an EFIS is making a mistake (unless they trade off the cost by skimping on something vital, like a carburetor).

I think the evolution of your ignition system is a good example of balance and data and changing opinion over time.  Points are more efficient and reliable than magnetos, though they require an electrical system.  Electronic is reliable too, and less parts to wear out.  But the CDI system I flew behind in the Rotax 912s would not operate if the voltage got below 11 volts (happens easily in MN in the winter).  One of the reasons I decided against one in my plane.  When you went to the E/P system you went to the effort to find / design a system that would operate on lower voltage.

As for aviation for the masses, companies aren’t run by Henry Ford anymore, and they are purely designed for profit now.

Sometimes I wonder if a useable, affordable home built car design / kit might get people into the notion that they can make things themselves, and would allow them to be more open to the idea of an affordable airplane project.  Of course the reaction from car manufacturers would probably be worse than the reaction from the aircraft industry.

OK, I get the V-8 Vega.  Horsepower to weight is pretty outrageous.  I am more of an autocrosser than a drag racer.  In fact, since I appear to be unable to work on my airplane or ride my motorcycle for possibly most of the summer, I have indulged in getting a car for autocross –  a ’91 Toyota MR2.  Probably not your style, but very good handling.  My motorcycle is a 2000 BMW R1100RTP – only 90 horsepower but I could leave any of the riders in my riding club in the dust if there were enough curves.

The hand is slowly getting better, but the new skin on the fingers blisters up if I write for too long or do anything mechanical, even if I wear a glove over the medical glove. The graft, as you suggested, doesn’t hurt at all now, and is more rugged. Don’t get drowned by the tropical storms or become snake food.-Becky Shipman

Builder Bruce Culver writes:

William, having done a bit of research on the Model T for a modeling project and possible historical article, I too was impressed by the tremendous influence this crate had on American society in the early 20th century. I also was impressed by the awareness of Henry Ford in paying his workers enough so they could afford to buy the cars they were building. In aviation, this seems to have slipped off the screen….. The tragedy is that with modern technology, making inexpensive and capable light aircraft would be easy for someone with the right attitude. I know wood has its drawbacks, but if a largely wood structure was assembled from pre-cut parts like a large model airplane, it would be safer and better built. The parts could be designed so that they went together only one way. I suspect that a safe wood fuselage structure could be designed, but to take welded steel tubing, there are automated welding machines that could weld a high-quality fuselage frame for those who have no experience. Or perhaps more welding classes would be a good idea, as I know that welding has to be done correctly or it’s no good. That is a concern of mine, as I have  no welding experience at all, and I have an XXXX (I edited out exact model of firearm here for privacy-ww) parts kit to put together – but that won’t kill me if I don’t get the welds right. Nonetheless, you are absolutely correct that the current emphasis on high-dollar designs in EAA will be the eventual death of light aviation. Get the price of a decent plane down to what the middle class can afford and the number of new pilots will grow significantly. Keep it up and the new folks won’t likely be around. When GA is cut down to size by this short-sighted attitude, EAA and AOPA will lose what political clout they have. Only the folks who have true homebuilt aircraft and engines, with the legal right to repair them, and the desire to fly for sport outside the ATC system, will have the privileges of private flight.

.

On the topic of Fixing America is going to cost each of us $1.69

Zenith 650 builder Paul Normandin writes:

Regarding Fixing America is going to cost us $1.69 each William, you are a seriously deranged individual and I am VERY glad you are!

My perspective on the world is much the same as your own, likely because we are almost the same age (beat you by a year). As a kid I played with those very same balsa planes, and you could buy them everywhere. My father always loudly expounded on the virtues of Briggs and Stratton engines and I took apart and reassembled these wonderfully simple and reliable machines many times in my youth, and never because they needed repair! Every one ran as before when I was done to boot, a testimony to B&S not me.

I plan on steam gauges for my Zenith and my coworkers think I am nuts using this “old technology”. You see, I work for a Robotics company and am neck-deep in high-tech all day and have many young coworkers. They are all very much as you described the current generation and there is nothing wrong with them; with their video games and cell phones glued to their heads they just didn’t have as much fun growing up as we did. Me, I have seen tech develop, hell, I have helped to create some of it, but with my life and safety on the line I just don’t trust it. I want to fly, I don’t want to play a video game in my plane… besides, I hope to some day be someone who you would be proud to call an Aviator. Thanks for all the great Corvair info and Philosophy, -Paul

Zenith Builder Bill Mills writes:

William, Great discussion on flat head engines. I have owned several in the past. Presently I have a 1934 and 1937 Fords and several one cylinder engines.  Also the snakes here in Florida; I have had several run ins with rattle snake, water moccasins or cotton mouths and copper heads, they all lost. Question: I am building the Zenith 650 from scratch and have reached a point the decide whether to use the standard sizes gas tanks or the long-range size. Your thoughts. Bill Mills EAA chapter 282 Clearwater, FL

Bill, I know of only one Corvair powered 601XL with 48 gallon tanks, Louis Kantor’s.  He flew from our airstrip in Florida to Pittsburgh, non stop, and had 11 gallons left on arrival. He later flew from Mexico MO to Pittsburgh, about the same distance. You can go a long way on  todays standard 30 gallon system, and the 4 way tank valve is very expensive. -ww.

Pietenpol Builder Jon Coxwell writes:

I just could not pass up commenting on the balsa wood planes.  I grew up in two worlds simultaneously literally 120 miles apart.  The first was in the largest city in Montana (Billings, about 60,000 when I was a kid, bigger now) and the second on a small cattle ranch nestled against the Little Belt Mountains in central Montana.  It was in my first world where I lived with a grandmother during the school year.  The house was at the intersection of two very quiet tree lined residential streets.  My airplane of choice was rubber band powered with jaunty long wire landing gear.  The only place my friends and I could have a successful takeoff was in the intersection of the two streets.  Other wise the plane would soon be in the trees.  Flying that rubber band powered ship was the impetus for learning to climb trees so I could retrieve it.  More than once, cars would stop and wait for us to complete our flight.  I think the adults got just as much fun out of it as we kids did.  (Those were the days when mothers and grandmothers knew of us playing in the street but just admonished us to watch for cars.  It was learning to take responsibility for our own actions.)  We would grease up the prop bearing with Vaseline and wind the rubber band to 16 knots to get an extra 20 feet of altitude.  What a life!

My second world was where I learned about motors.  I do not remember any flat head lawn mowers but I did build an electric reel mower from plans in Popular Mechanics.  My step dad was always overhauling a tractor, truck, or the little jeep in less than ideal conditions.  A family friend gave me an old Wizzer bike motor and I proceeded to build a go kart.  It didn’t work well as all the roads were dirt and rutted but my dad saw my interest and proceeded to help me scrounge Model T parts from all the old homesteads.  He knew where all of the old Fords had been pushed into the brush when the homesteaders starved out in the thirties.  Before I was out of high school I had a running Model T to chug around the hills in.  The only thing I had to buy was 2 tires.  When the GN-1 flies it will be dedicated to my natural father (a WWII B-24 squad commander) who gave me the genetic interest in flying and my step dad who taught me the manual skills and patience I needed to build an airplane.

.

On the topic of MCW is 60 today.

builder Martie writes:

Happy Birthday, Michael!

Zenith builder Oscar Zuniga  writes:

William; as the second eldest among 10 children, I can really relate to your comments and observations on how things work among siblings.  I can only hope that some of the things that I’ve been involved with in my life (motorcycles, especially vintage Triumphs; street rods; cartooning; engineering; aviation; salt water fishing; hunting, camping, rafting, boat building) have been of interest for my 4 brothers and 5 sisters and their wonderful families as they have followed behind me.  You know what they say about being back in the pack string in a line of sled dogs though: unless you’re No. 1, the view never changes ;o)

Pietenpol builder Terry Hand writes:

Your comments from the heart may be among the best gifts your brother receives today. Nicely written. Happy birthday, Michael!

.

Parting Shot from Sprint Builder Joe Goldman:

We just lost Roy Hall from a heart attack, hard living, and hard drinking. You should have visited me at his shop. You would have enjoyed his stories. I first thought they were BS, but I always listened. I found out from his friends and visitors that looked in on him that they were not  exaggerations but were even more amazing. Roy was a machinist and metallurgist and foremost a pilots pilot. He  was a lover of old, old machines.  His large lathe was 110 years old, turned my three axles on it, as is his horizontal shaper. His huge vertical shaper with turret is a little newer. He has machines and furnaces that he built. He owned and flew a DC 3, Stearman, and Beech 18. The 3 and 18 carried so much gas in their modified wings that they looked like a B52’s. Well, a living is a living ( no dope just gas and repairs). I worked by his Stearman with “The world’s greatest aviator” written on its side. Right next to me was a Travel Air fuselage that Roy beautifully rebuilt. He teared sometimes because he knew he was unable to finish it. He has many friends and impressed many people with his skills, though He was a pain in the ass was heard.

August 2011 I moved my Sprint to Roy’s place. I felt sorry for him and that he could use my rent. Turned out I did myself good. We worked on my landing gear. Lots of metal forming on his press and dies. He made sure I didn’t screw up. He did all the welding. His TIG welds were smooth. He covered all finished welds with asbestos like material. He enjoyed working on my plane. It turns out I was the last one to use his skills.        I remember telling him about Marks tight turn and how he could make it back to the airport in 250ft. He remarked just unload the wings and you can turn on a dime. I will miss him. Maybe if I do something dumb in the air I ‘ll hear him yelling Just fly the damn plane. Joe Goldman

Happy Father’s Day William E. Wynne Sr.

Friends of ours know that I refer to my father as “The Real William Wynne.” Below are a few notes and photos from the family album. Grace and I both hope that this Father’s Day finds each of you in the company of family and friends, taking a few moments to consider the most important men in our lives.

blog061613a

Above, my father’s official USN photo circa 1975. My father enlisted in the Navy during World War II, graduated from the Naval Academy with the Class of 1949, served in both Korea and Vietnam, and in the final total, spent 33 years on active duty. His service remains the centerpiece of his life’s work. Please take a minute to read: William Edward Wynne Sr. –  Father’s Day Notes; it is a story I wrote about father on his 84th birthday. If you have ever wondered why I am intolerant of police states without human rights like China, the story will be illuminating. In this photo, my father is 50 years old, the same age as I am today.

blog061613b

Above, my father speaking with HRH, the King of Thailand, in 1974.  Thailand is a constitutional monarchy like England, but the Thais hold the deepest reverent respect for their royal family. The King is the longest serving ruler in the world, and is widely understood as a very positive force in a part of the world that knew very little peace or freedom. He was educated in the United States and knew that his country was on the front lines of the Cold War.

The location of the photo was a construction site on Doi Inthanon, the tallest mountain in SE Asia. From 1971-74, my father was the OICC (Officer in Charge of Construction) in Thailand. This included numerous military and civilian infrastructure projects in Thailand, Laos and Cambodia, and places as distant as Diego Garcia. My father worked equally hard on building hospitals and roads as he did building airbases. While all of Thailand’s neighbors, Burma, Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam, fell into savage rule by communist totalitarian regimes that ran from repressive police states to genocide, the Thai people were spared this trip to hell. My father remains very proud of the role he played in preventing their enslavement.

As a show of respect for our Thai hosts, we lived in a typical Thai home, went to regular schools, learned the language, ate the food and always were deeply respectful of the people, customs and beliefs of our host nation. My father drilled into us that any shortcoming on our part would be tantamount to sabotaging the work that he and many other Americans were doing to ensure excellent relations between the two countries.  Today, 42 years later, I have no patience for any American who goes abroad and forgets what the word “guest” means.  At the conclusion of our time there, the Thai Secretary of Defense presented the Order of the White Elephant to my father. It is the medal on the ribbon around his neck in his official photo above.

blog061613c

Above, a fuzzy 1968 newspaper clipping of my father upon his return from Vietnam. At the far right is my brother Michael. Last week I told the story of Michael turning 60. I have said many times that if my father had not returned, my life would have amounted to very little. I spend a part of every Father’s Day thinking of all of the sons who were not so lucky. I will always remain thankful for this blessing.

The photo above was taken by the U.S. Navy in early 1968, at the same time as the one above. In my 5-year-old hand, I hold the Bronze Star awarded to my father during his 1967 tour in Vietnam. It is one of my favorite photos with my father.

Both Grace and I hope that these words and few photos spark many good thoughts and memories of your own families. We hope you have many blessings for which you are thankful. Of course, every member of our family is very proud of my father, but he would be the first person to tell you that he isn’t any kind of a hero nor a special person. He just takes great pride in being part of the American generation that JFK was speaking of when he said:

“Let the word go forth that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans—born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage—and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this Nation has always been committed.”

3

MCW is 60 today.

Friends,

Today, my brother, Michael Wynne, turns 60. Although few of the aircraft builders we work with have met him in person, I can make a very good case that all Corvair builders are direct beneficiaries of his. My brother has been the largest influence in my life steering me into the mechanical world, and he has demonstrated by example how goals in life are to be accomplished. He is nine-and-a-half years older than me. He is the leading edge of our family and I am the trailing.  This is a good analogy to express my brother’s leadership position as the pathfinder in our family. He is also the eldest of all of the cousins. He made everything we have done, going to college, getting married, you name it, much easier to do by the simple example of doing all of these things first.

But my own connection goes far further than this: My love of airplanes was derived from his; I love machines, craftsmanship and tools because he did first; I became a motorhead because he was first. I love GM stuff because he did first. These are just mechanical examples. I love the outdoors and travel because he does. I know every song by The Doors, Hendrix, CCR, Grand Funk and Steppenwolf, bands 10 years before my time, simply because this was music that he listened to, and thus so did I. My definition of what it means to be an American is clearly patterned after his. Normally such blind emulation might lead to trouble later, but not for me, as my brother is an outstanding human being, and the parts of me that are a low quality imitation of him are better than the parts I came up with on my own. I am not the only one in the family who feels this way. The three other kids in our family will gladly concede that he is the best child our family produced.

39063

Above, the six original members of my family (we are all married now), left to right above, Alison, Michael, Mom, Dad, myself and Melissa, at mom’s 80th birthday in 2007.

blog0608131

Above, a photo of my parents on the beach at Coronado, Calif., in 1952. The smiles don’t speak of my father, a young Navy officer in amphibious warfare, having  just returned from his first tour in the Korean War. He had left from San Francisco in 1951. My mother, 24 years old, had seen him off and boarded a Martin 4-0-4 for the flight back to San Diego. In flight, the plane had a terrific engine fire on her side. It was a rocky start to a long year, but my mother made the strongest friends with other Navy wives, awaiting and praying for the safe return of husbands from the new war.

The story of my brother’s arrival in ’53 is integral to understanding the history of my family. On New Year’s Eve 1952, my father received an emergency notice recalling him to Korea. My mother, expecting her first child, had the option to return to her caring family on the east coast, but instead chose to stay in Coronado with the other young wives, women who shared the same struggles.

Above, my father stands in the rubble of Seoul, the capital of Korea. My brother came more than a month early. At that moment, my father was near Wolmi-do island with the 1st Marine Division, under communist air attack. My mother had not heard from him in weeks, went to the delivery room knowing only that he was in an area of hard fighting. Ten days later my father’s unit was withdrawn to Japan.

By chance, a friend said that there had been a message for him. A search of hundreds of notes in the com center revealed one that only said “Lt. j.g. Wynne: Boy. Wife, baby, doing well.” A drive to another base finds a Ham radio operator, then a clear connection to another Ham in California, and a phone link. My mother tells him she has chosen to name the boy Michael Christopher Wynne. My father is very moved; it is his own father’s name.

It is several months before he can come back. It was a difficult birth, and my brother is born with terrible colic. My mother is exhausted when he arrives, and collapses in sleep. Here is my father’s home-coming from his first war: He is a new father, rocking his son to sleep in a quiet apartment in California. This tiny boy in his arms is named for his own father, the hero of my father’s world, a man who is fading in a long twilight of his life. On this evening in August of 1953, my father certainly understands how fortunate he is. He is married to a very strong person; he has survived a war that others have not; and he holds his own son in his arms. In the coming years it will take all of these blessings to sustain him through the agonizingly slow loss of his own father.

blog060813a

Above is a photo of all of us in 1964. (That’s me in the middle.) At first glance, we are sitting for a Christmas card picture. But if you look a little closer, it is easy to see that my brother, just 11 here, is already looking over us as the responsible oldest child. A few years after this, when Michael is barely a teenager, my father leaves for Vietnam. Before departing, he explains to my brother what is expected of young men in his position, and that there is a possibility he will not return. We do not see him or have a single call for 14 months. Yet my brother needs no further words to guide nor reinforce him. It is the beginning of a lifetime of always being willing to accept a responsibility and execute it faithfully.

When I was small, my brother was a shining star I was happy just to admire. When I was a teenager, with a myopic self-absorbed view of the world, I was quietly envious of what I perceived to be disproportionate attention that had been focused on my brother’s youth; perhaps this is every youngest child’s view of the eldest. To this day I remain embarrassed to how slowly I woke up to the reality that my brother’s youth had not been the paradise I had selfishly imagined. It had expectations and burdens that, as the youngest child, I was well insulated from. My parents set high expectations for us, and my brother met them. Much later I understood my parents were kind enough to lower the bar for the end of the line that might not have met these standards.

blog060813b

Above, Michael, myself and our father horsing around on Michael’s 30th birthday in ’83. Many builders have met my father at Corvair Colleges and air shows, and read many of the things I have written about him. I carry my father’s name, but truth be told, Michael is much more like my father than I am. In all the ways that count, all the qualities of character, my brother’s life is a much better tribute to the sterling example that our father gave to both of us.

Many people know that my father is a lifelong engineer, trained at the Naval academy, RPI and Columbia. In our generation, it is my brother who has carried on this tradition. When our family departed for duty in Thailand, my brother stayed 10,000 miles behind and started his engineering work at Lehigh. In the summers he came to Asia and volunteered for assignments on infrastructure projects in Cambodia and Vietnam. He often flew to sites in Barons and King Airs with my father.

Arriving at a remote site in Cambodia, my father had the pilot orbit above for a look. A moment later an identical plane flies a straight-in approach and is shot down by a hail of small arms fire off the end of the runway. There are no survivors. My mother explains that she can accept that she may one day lose my father, but she can not lose both of them. My father understands. They do not fly on the same aircraft again.

My brother studies oceanography at the university of Hawaii before moving into environmental engineering. An important part of his work is ensuring that large corporations work in compliance with established laws and standards. When a younger generation in our family was speaking of “protecting the environment,” I pointed out that they could do “gestures” like wearing t-shirts, going on marches or sending e-mails, or they could do something real like Michael has, by having the commitment to become educated and do the long-term hard work that will have an actual effect to protect the environment.

blog060813c

My brother would gladly tell anyone that the best thing that ever happened to him is being married to his lovely wife Louise. In her he found a soulmate with the same energy and values. Louise has played much the same role in her own family that Michael has in ours. The photo is from when they were first married 25 years ago. I had the honor of being Michael’s best man. Seventeen years later, he returned this as the best man at my wedding.

blog060813d

Above, dad with his first grandchild, Michael Jr. in 1986.  Thirty three years earlier, upon his return from Korea, dad held Michael Sr. in the same arms. Fate had robbed my father from sharing his sons’ lives with his own father. As a great blessing, this generation has been spared. My brother’s family lives only 15 miles from my parents, and my brother has had many days of joy with his two sons in the company of our father. Both Michael Jr. and Brian have followed their parents’ example of taking family responsiblity seriously, and they both put a lot of effort into taking care of their grandparents.

blog060813e

Above, Michael with his two sons, Michael Jr. and Brian, when the boys were young. I have written about the America of the Stand by Me and October Sky generation. This had passed by the time of my youth in the ’70s, but it was the America that my brother grew up in. My brother earned the rank of Eagle Scout in 1970. In Hawaii he was my assistant Scout Master. He has standards that dictate that any form of favoritism is vile corruption. I jokingly point out that me getting to Tenderfoot in his troop was as easy as a recruit getting through bootcamp on Parris Island. He went on to many years of service as Scout Master in his sons’ troop. His sons both went all the way to Eagle Scout. Let me attest, he made them earn it to the highest standards.

Today, both Michael Jr. and Brian are both college graduates, one from Boston University, the other from Boston College. They are brothers, but different men. A testimonial to being raised in a home where they were taught to think for themselves, not what to think.

blog060813f

Above, Michael and I stand behind his Corvette. Funny family story: one day Louise is at the Chevy dealer having routine service done on their Suburban. She walks into the showroom and looks at Corvettes for a few minutes, asks the salesman only one question about colors and bought one on the spot for my brother. To the salesman, he thought he was looking at an impulse buy from one of the greatest spouses ever.  In reality, Louise had long known my brother wanted one, but put it off for other responsibilities. She just thought he deserved it. Everyone agreed.

Many people today are obsessed with making deals, finding the short cut, the exception, the flexible rule, the gray area. My brother Michael is the anthesis of this. He is always willing to do more than his part, even when no one notices. He would rather spend the time putting in the genuine effort than asking for a break. He doesn’t think there is anything wrong with paying your dues. He doesn’t need special treatment, he will do just fine playing by the rules. He is the kind of American we nostalgically like to think grew on trees here. In reality, people like him have always been rare, and in my book he deserves every good thing that has, can and will happen in is life.

Happy Birthday Brother.- wewjr.

Flathead Ford, 71 cid. Freedom to pursue happiness.

Builders:

Following up on the topic of flat heads, here is the flagship of our personal flat head fleet. Pictured is a tiny flat head Ford from a 1948 Anglia. If you know model A’s, this engine will look very familiar.

588057

Above, the busy side. This is a four-cylinder engine, but it is only 71 cubic inches. It has a nominal HP rating or 8 or 10 by some English taxation system, but its actual power output is about 20 ponies. This engine came in a very small car, a 1948 Anglia, built by Ford in England. I got the engine from Vern, who had it for 25 or 30 years. I have motored it over with a very powerful drill, and it has good compression. The only thing missing is the starter. The transmission is a 3 speed that would fit in a coffee can. The engine was built in England, but the design is pure Ford.

588056

For size, that is a 12″ ruler sitting on the head. the item ay the lower right is an external water pump. The clutch is a 6″ unit. For a while I thought about making a 3/4 scale Pietenpol Sky scout with it, then gave some thought to re-engining our tiny Case tractor with it. It is a bite sized marvel of simplicity, and it makes you day dream of a use for it.

.

As an aside, I looked on the web and found that the starter is very easy to buy from clubs and shops in England where Angilas were predominantly sold. There are car clubs that restore and drive them there. The main thing Americans did with Anglias was use the bodies for dragsters.

Above, a blown, injected Big Block Chevy powers this American ’48 Anglia. It will run a 1/4 mile in the mid seven second range. Thats zero to 180 mph in less than eight seconds. This car probably has 75 times the original power output of the little flat head.

.

When I contacted the people in England, a funny thing happened: They refused to sell me any part, including a manual for the engine. They pointed out that their website said “Absolutely no sales to Americans.” When I asked why, I was told that they were ‘afraid of being sued.’ I politely asked if they had ever heard of a single person in the US who had ever sued anyone in England over any vehicle part. They couldn’t name one, but they had decided to live in fear of this, even though there is no legal mechanism to allow it to happen. I pointed out that I was not likely to get hurt in a 20 hp car. No luck. Just because I am a jackass, I asked them if a guy wrote them from Pakistan and said he needed a part to finish the car bomb he had made out of an Anglia so he could drive it down to the market place, could he buy it? Answer: “Well, we don’t have any rules against that, so yes, but we do have rules against selling to Americans.”

Neville Shute AWW 1949.jpg

Above, Nevil Shute. Pilot, builder, enginner and writer.

.

We have a number of friends in Great Britain. 145 years ago 50% of my DNA lived there.  My favorite Aero engineer of all time is Nevil Shute. I have a 1959 Triumph 650. On the topic of English history, I am the most well read American most people have ever met. I like many things about the people there, but in many ways, today’s Britons live in a fear driven bureaucracy I would find maddening. Not only are they afraid of impossible lawsuits, you find other things like flying a Corvair there is illegal (technically it is under review, but is has been so for 10 years.) You can not build a Pietenpol in Britain, because the design was deemed, without any evidence, to be horribly dangerous. The Pietenpols in Britain look like ours, but their government paid professionals to design a new structure for it, presumably in the name of ‘safety.’  Fair enough: Would you like to build their ‘better’ version? You can’t, because of course they will not sell Americans the drawings.

Above, A man, a plane and an engine. In Britain, by bureaucratic decree, he is a dangerous person to be stopped, the design unairworthy, the engine not to be flown. Here, the engine flies by the hundreds, the plane has been built for eight decades, and the man is hailed as the patron saint of homebuilding. The Atlantic is very wide, but the gulf between perspectives is wider.

.

In the history of aviation Britain has had many outstanding pilots engineers and builders. They made many fantastic designs. If you like motorcycles, you know that the British ruled the roads for 50 years. They made great machines, even if we like to make fun of Lucas electrics. If their traditional creativity was unleashed, many people in America would be flying British designed and kitted experimentals, instead of the tiny fraction of their designs that are flown here. But somewhere along the line, for reasons I don’t claim to understand, they dropped out of the running.

A man I have never met, named Francis Donaldson, has been the sole person in Great Britain passing judgement over what people there will be allowed to build. As far as I can tell, he does this on his own personal whim. He has been in charge of this since 1990, yes, the same job, one guy 23 years.  Many people from England have told me he is a nice guy, but I am not inclined to like a person who has been telling people for 23 years that a Pietenpol, a plane flying here for 84 years, is unairworthy.

Maybe if I was raised to believe that I was a ‘subject’, that God selected a king to rule me, and that a type of human called an ‘aristocrat’ was a better ‘class’ than me, I would have much more tolerance for one man arbitrarily making decisions for me. But alas, 50% of my ancestors left that behind when they got in 4th class steerage to come here, a land where they would be judged by their hard work and ethics, not their ‘class status.’ I am just another one of those “Crass Colonials” who doesn’t know his place, who will never understand the wisdom of a life appointment bureaucrat making decisions for me.

If you live on this side of the pond, and you like airplanes, go back to the family tree and thank the person who had the wisdom to get on the boat. Over the years, I have heard aviators who were political extremists from both sides of the fence make the stupid comment “If so and so wins, I am leaving.” What a joke. It would be nice if everyone who ever said that did us a favor and followed through, but I can’t think of a single one who ever did. This is your proof that things are not perfect for aviators here, just better than anywhere else.

Tonight, perhaps 200 people in America are going out to their workshops, to put in a few hours of progress on their Corvair powered Pietenpol project. When completed, many of these planes will be masterpieces like Mike Groahs, Gary Boothe’s and Kurt Shipman’s. Most will be good solid planes, and a handful will be pieces of feces. Every one of them can get an airworthyness cert. for phase one flight testing because the neither the FAA nor a DAR can deny a builder one. Here we believe that humans should be in charge of their own lives, including the potential to end these lives. Truly ironic that Darwin was from England, but we are the ones who recognize his genius in social engineering. This, in place of a lifetime bureaucrat is the single biggest reason why American designs dominate the world-wide homebuilt market.

We are not better than other people, we are not special humans. Unless your family was here in 1491, we are the other people, a nation of people from somewhere else. In this experiment, the people are the same, only the system is different.  We  have a system that allows the individuals who are better, work harder and are gifted to rise to the top. I don’t feel better than fellow aviators elsewhere, I just feel lucky to be here, working in our system. Some people here like to gripe, and that’s fine, as long as it comes with the acknowledgement that aviation freedom is a lot easier to pursue here.

If you are one of the two hundred, celebrate your good luck and freedom by going out to the shop to work on a plane that, were you living in Britain, would land you in prison after your first flight.  Do some solid work tonight that would make Bernard proud. Think of your fellow aviators, men just like you, but fate determined you to have freedom to build as you mind wishes and your hands are able, and they must wait another decade or two for the whim of a bureaucrat to change. When you are done for the night, take a few minutes to admire your work. Offer a salute to your brother aviators  living in repression on the other side of the pond by drinking a Cold beer.-ww

.

*If any friends from the other side of the pond are heading to Brodhead or Oshkosh, I welcome you to come over and lecture me at length about what a crass colonial jackass I am. If you can smuggle a starter out of the kingdom for me, I will print a retraction, sing God save the Queen, and do my best to drink one warm beer with you. If Frances Donaldson is visiting, please advise him that we plan to teach him how to have fun, culminating in him getting drunk on Jack Daniels, taking him Lynyrd Skynyrd concert in an F-250, and flying him around the pattern in an original Pietenpol powered by a Corvair. He may never go home.

Model T of the air, Part #2 – Leeon Davis notes

Builders,

I mentioned Leeon Davis in the first part of this story. There is not much biographical information on him on the web, but I found this link below , It has a good short summary of his designs:

http://www.angelfire.com/ks2/janowski/other_aircraft/Davis/

Above, Rex Johnston’s Corvair powered DA-2

There are long articles on the DA-11 and the DA-9 in back issues of Contact! magazine. A long time ago in the 1990s, Sport Aviation did a story on the DA-9. At 375 pounds, powered by a C-90 Continental turning high rpm, it would do 290mph, an impressive special purpose missile.

There have been several Corvair powered DA-2’s. The best known one is Jim Ballew’s in Oklahoma. It has about 500 hours on it. Jim also has a Corvair powered 601 and a Corvair powered Pietenpol. There are links to all three at this story:  Another new “Zenvair” 601XLB, Jim Ballew, 2700cc

Rex Johnston’s DA-2 is a story that gets a lot of attention on our website, because his plane is the first Corvair powered plane with Electronic Fuel Injection. In the 20 years I have been teaching people about Corvair engines, I have had many people tell me that they were going to do this, but Rex was the guy with the combination of skills and persistence. You can read about it at this link:  Corvair Powered Davis DA-2, w/EFI

In part one, I said that Leeon Davis was the most outspoken proponent of mass-produced aircraft at an affordable price. His hall marks were light weight and extreme simplicity. Today, it is very hard to imagine how against the grain this was in the 1988-94 time line. The ‘Fast Glass’ rage was on, and many new high-end designs came out that got a lot of attention, even when they were not particularly good designs.  (Prescott Pusher and the Cirrus VK-30 come to mind here). You can read my story 2,500 words about levels of aircraft finsh…… to get an inside look at how these aircraft distorted the world of homebuilding and aviation journalism.

Davis was sending out the message of simplicity, just when few people were listening, as the magazines began to focus on planes that reflected the “conspicuous consumption” mentality. One of the real differences of that era was also a reflection of a change in society. People willing to heavily finance their hobby on credit. Previous to this people took out loans for houses and cars, but not often homebuilts. If you read the magazines of the 1960s, it is very clear that people built from savings or paid for the plane in parts as the made progress.  Kit aircraft go all the way back to Bernard Pietenpol and Ed Heath, but the explosion of kitbuilding only came after the 1980’s provided an accumulation of wealth and the willingness to spend even more. A great number of the high end planes of the 1990s were financed by an outfit called Green Tree financial. They had previously specialized in financing mobile homes, but moved heavily into boats , motorcycles and planes in the 1990s. If you read their history, it is filled with all the buzz words we learned in 2008 like “securitized loan packaging”. This new availability of money to loan, the national mood to accept debt and the glowing coverage high end planes received put Davis’s message of realism off the radar. Look back, it is easy to see that the three factors above sold a lot of kits, but few of them were completed, and many of the people who did would have been happier listening to Leeon’s perspective.

I don’t want to imply that just composite builders were getting lost in this either; Look how quickly beautifully simple ultralights all became complicated. Same with metal aircraft, and fabric ones. All attention was all focused on the most elaborate machines. Very few articles ever said how much the airplane weighed or cost, two elements that Davis focused on. A lancair 320 called ‘dream catcher’ and a Pacer named ‘miss pearl’ come to mind as two planes that got a lot of press coverage for their detail paint and interior, but were each very heavy examples of their respective designs. The EZ’s built to Rutans specified simplicity and planes like Dave Anders 900 pound RV-4 didn’t get anywhere near the attention.

In 1998, I came very close to buying the design rights and tooling for the DA-2, but found the owner (not Leeon) a hard guy to deal with. I didn’t consider it a perfect plane, but felt that it was a good starting point. I spent a lot of time with Gus Warren and a set of drawings, and we looked at blind rivets, a different wing planform and a thicker airfoil. Once we agreed on a value, the owner specified that he would only accept payment in a form that the IRS and his ex couldn’t track. That was the derailment, not the design.

In the past 25 years, the qualities I like in planes and find important have evolved. You can read about more about this at this story: Steel tube fuselages, “Safe” planes and 250mph accidents . Before I knew how to fly I was captivated by slow landing Stol planes, because I incorrectly thought they would be easy to fly. Likewise I was initially following ‘stall proof’ planes until an instructor made me do an hours worth of stalls from every angle and approach, and then explained that flight qualities before and after stall are more important. I learned that many textbook/hangar flying ‘truths’ , like a 23012 having a ‘dangerous stall’ are a myth.

A point I would like to make is that I liked Davis’s values as a designer, even if his aircraft were not the best ones for myself. We could ask Jim Ballew if he likes flying his 601XL more than his DA-2. He might, especially if he was flying out of a short strip. I can make a case that a Panther would radically out perform a DA-5 on the same power. Davis went to extreme measures to save weight, and his planes have short spans and very little wing area. probably a reflection of flying from flat areas of the country and paved strips. Yet I can make a very good case that both the 601XL and the Panther have a great allegiance to simplicity. Chris Heintz and Dan Weseman moved slightly off stone simple to add a lot of capability to their planes, but they didn’t lose sight of the concept of affordability.

People who have never met me or just glanced at something I wrote may think of me as opinionated. But if you ask people who have known me for a long time, they will tell you that my perspectives evolved in the long run. I have always been interested in the results of a test, to see if a direction shift was in order. I have always listened to people with experience to learn from them. I am more likely to look for an indication I am wrong than a validation I am right. Today I have a refined and focused set of things that are important to me in aviation. If things go well, I have 20-25 flying seasons left, and I want to spend them on things I like, not what I ‘should be doing.’ I have a pretty good set of answers for myself, but they were not the ones I started with. I don’t need people to agree with mine, the point is only to find your own. The one thing that has not changed in my perspective is the thing I learned from Leeon Davis: simplicity and lower cost will always be vital characteristics. -ww

Mail Sack, 6/4/13, Model T’s, Charles Poland Jr. and reptiles

Builders,

Here is a sample of the mail:

.

On the story of Model T of the air? :

Builder Dan Branstrom writes:

“Budd Davisson wrote two pireps on Davis designs, The DA2 and the DA5:”
http://www.airbum.com/pireps/PirepDavisDA2.html
http://www.airbum.com/pireps/PirepDA5.html

Builder  “Jacksno”  writes:

“Wynne for President.”

I couldn’t agree more, I will let my sister Melissa, the Illinois politician, know that you nominated her.I think she could get elected, her only liability is a jackass politically incorrect brother in Florida.-ww

.

On the story of Charles Poland Jr., An American of whom you could be proud.:

Builder Harold Bickford writes:

“Indeed William, where do we get such men and women? Certainly we can cite many reasons relating to upbringing, family, culture, experience. faith. One place they don’t come from is selfishness. Being a veteran Charles knew what service was and the calling that goes with it even to ultimate sacrifice standing in the breech.

Likewise building airplanes and engines can’t be a selfish enterprise. Where there is success it is because folks listen to and help each other and pay attention to solid information which at times has been gained at great cost. To the question some ask about building the response is simple; why not give it a try? They’re often expecting a defensive answer and instead they have to think. -Harold”

601XL Builder/flyer Dr. Gary Ray writes:

“Any person or group that attacks innocent, unarmed soft targets looses all rights to claim any violation of their own individual rights as this makes the claims hypocritical while trashing the individual rights of others.  It is like profanity, a feeble mind trying to act forcefully.  Also, an act of cowardice.”

Builder  Dan Branstrom writes:

“I rarely pass on anything that has been forwarded multiple times, unless I can go to the source and verify it, and I’ve fact checked it.  [Jokes excluded].

What I usually find is that a quote didn’t come from the person who “said” it, that things stated as “facts” started out as opinions expressed by some columnist years ago, and, for propaganda purposes, lies are mixed with truth to make them appear plausible.  Sometimes, the sources cited turn out to say exactly the opposite of what the email claims they did. I used to email a reply to the earliest person who forwarded it, but I got accused of being an evil person involved in some international conspiracy at best.  I now only reply to the last person who forwarded it to me.  We’re friends, and they understand that I want truth and honest discourse, and that even if we disagree, we’ll stay friends.”

.

On the story of Fun with Agkistrodon Piscivorus and Vern’s Aero-Trike:

Pietenpol builder Terry Hand writes:

“William, I am sure that Vern’s sock was not the only item of apparel that got soaked! I am glad to hear that both of you are safe. Please make sure and keep an eye out for Scoob E. Semper Fi, Terry Hand”

Zenith builder  Larry MaGruder  writes:

“We have a good number of all four here in Texas, too. Still don’t like them.”

Builder  “Jeffeoso”  writes:

“I do beg to differ – Texas has all four native poisonous species as well…”

Hey, learned something new, you Texans are right. When it gets to the point of stepping on them in the hangar, they seem pretty dense here. Hope they are a little thinner in your state.-ww.

Pietenpol builder Jon Coxwell  writes:

“I am mostly scared to death of snakes.  I learned that from my mom.  She dislikes all creepy crawly thing.  Prior to WWII my father flew sub patrol with B-17s in central America.  My mom  followed him from airfield to airfield all over central America.  One night while driving they ran over a boa and my dad decided he wanted the snake (probably for the skin).  He went out into the jungle on the side of the road with a flash light and his army issue .45 until he found the head and he shot it.  My mother had to help him stuff the shake into the trunk of the car.  She never forgot that. That is a cool vehicle!  Is it licensed as a car, airplane, or Motorcycle?”

Jon, Vern’s creation is a motorcycle in Florida. We have no emissions nor inspections here, and you can license just about anything you wish to drive. Combine this with no state income tax and it all seems like a great deal until you come back to the snake thing. For more on the trike, check this link: Vern’s Aero-Cars , (hit F5 if the pictures are small.)

Pietenpol builder  Harold Bickford writes:

“In the wall Street Journal under economy the 6/3 issue has an article about the increasingly risk averse culture. It seems too many folks do’t even want to try, instead looking for elusive security. Fortunately here at flycovair people aren’t so timid and are willing to investigate and do.- Harold”

Harold, Vern is the only guy here willing to dance on poisonous snakes, He sets the standard.-ww

Zenith 601XL builder/flyer Ron Lendon writes:

“WW, I thought being your neighbor might be fun, now I’m not so sure.”

Ron, we should have draped the carcass on my neighbors ‘For sale’ real estate sign to hear how his agent would explain it to potential buyers.-ww

Cruiser builder Sarah Ashmore  writes:

“When I was young while on an evening walk with my father I almost stepped on a Copperhead that was in the laying middle of the street. I had never seen a live snake and assumed that it was dead like every other one I had ever seen. My father was far more aware of the dangers then I was and I remember a very strong grip taking me by the shoulder and yanking me back before the snake had become aware of my approach and become defensive. A single whack with a convenient branch dispatched the threat and I have never been so casual again when out amongst nature. The funny thing is that my professional career has returned me now to the city of my youth and with a storm drainage ditch in my back yard I maintain a constant vigil for anything that might be a snake. With all the years I lived in Florida I saw but one rattlesnake and a single Corral Snake. “Red touches Yellow, kill a fellow, Red touches Black, friend of Jack” was the guideline I kept in mind to be sure I did not mistake the deadly Corral Snake from the beneficial King Snake.”

Zenith 750 Builder Dan Glaze writes:

“they say that everyone has a double, ole Vern sure looks a lot like Albert standing there, dan-o”

Builder Dan Branstrom  writes:

“I ate water moccasin (aka cottonmouth) on land survival at Eglin AFB, 45 years ago, along with poke salad, palmetto hearts, and even wood rat.  All I can remember is, just like the cliche, it tasted somewhat like chicken. Somebody else had gigged it swimming in the water.  He nailed it in the body, and the snake still tried to climb up the shaft to bite him I sure wouldn’t like to meet one any closer.  I know you’ll be careful.”

Parting Shot from Zenith builders Bob and Pat Pustell :

“Hi, William–My birthday may preceded yours by a decade and a half, but I am with you on almost everything you posted lately. I loved my balsa gliders/rubber band airplanes as a kid. I loved my balsa and tissue paper stick built planes even more, but it was more painful when they got wrecked. Great fun and many lessons. The plastic models were fun, too, but you could not fly them.

I loved the old flathead utility engines. My Grandmother’s place had no electricity, kerosene lamps and a Briggs and Stratton powered well pump. Many times, as a remarkably young guy, I had that engine apart and got it running again. It powered that wellpump for many decades. My first hot-rodding project was a cast-off lawn mower. It turned such high revs when we were done with it that we eventually put the rod through the side of the case, but man could that thing cut tall grass at full power!! I could tune up a flathead Ford V8 pretty nicely, also. Small block Chevies were my stock in trade in later years, however.

Stick and Rudder was my first and is still my favorite aviation book. Anything by Ernie Gann is right up there, too. I never met Ernie but I flew with guys who did know him from when he worked for my airline. Even second-hand, I enjoyed the glow……… Before the airline, I flew in the Air Force with Medal of Honor winners, regular guys, everyday heroes. We have a wonderful country going here. Let’s keep it that way.

Oh, about those big nasty venomous snakes in your area — I moved to northern New England to retire for a reason — I had enough of those nasty creatures in southeast asia and the southwest desert of the US. Come on up and join us. The winters are not as bad as people would make you think. The rest of the year is wonderful and we do not do venom, tornadoes, major hurricanes or earthquakes.

Best wishes to you and Grace and ScoobE, Bob and Pat Pustell”

Model T of the air?

Builders,

This is a topic I have spent a lot of time thinking about over the last 25 years. Over time my perspective has changed with more experience, and knowing more about people and what their ambitions and goals are. I could write a small book on this topic, but let me just run some highlights past you as food for your own thought, and tie it in to your homebuilt project.

Above, the model T, in production 1908-27, 15 million sold, Most influential motor vehicle of all time. The price actually went from $850 down to $260 during the production run. In 1914, the car cost about $450, and this was about the amount of money that one of Ford’s unskilled workers made in 3 or 4 months. This car was not the best one of its times, nor was it the fastest, or was it at the top of many other measures. Yet it was king on the only quality that mattered then and now for an influential product: affordability.

25 years ago when I was first getting started in aviation, I already knew that I wanted to work primarily in general aviation, personal aircraft had more interest to me than transport or military ones. Factory GA aircraft were essentially out of production, the last waves of production of the ‘affordable’ Pipers and Cessnas had already been sold. Their demise is often blamed on product liability, but if you look into it deeply, a lot of it is high inflation in 1979-81, the fact the IRS closed a loop hole that allowed rampant fraudulent write-offs of aircraft expenses, and the fact that huge corporations now owned the aircraft companies that were started by families, their ‘loyalty’ was to profits not affordable production are more to blame.

At the time, people who dreamed of restarting America’s aircraft manufacturing predominantly hung around experimental aviation. I was new, but wanted any small part in a revolution that would bring  planes that working people could buy. My motivation was partially selfish, I was a broke college student headed into the ‘get rich slow’ field of aircraft maintenance. If there was a single man who was the outspoken proponent and visionary of this time it was Leeon Davis. Many people might have thought I was going to type the name Rutan, but if you ever have a chance to read Davis’s book Where is my Dream plane? * you will understand why he was without peer on this. I had a chance to meet him in person just once, but I read just about everything he ever wrote on planes.

Above, a Davis DA-11, Leeon’s idea of what affordable and mass producible could be. It weighed 175 pounds, cruised at 125 mph. It was powered by a Briggs and Stratton 18 hp engine.  A back issue of Contact magazine has an extensive story on it written by Mr.Davis. He designed a number of planes, the DA-2 being the best known. There is a good video of him and a flying DA-11 at this link:  http://airpigz.com/blog/2010/4/6/video-mower-power-to-the-people-remembering-leeon-davis.html

Below is Henry Ford’s comment on his goal with the model T. In five years, when people ask why the factory built S-LSA planes all flopped, you can point back to this quote, that evidently none of the people producing, or the aviation journalist writing reviews of S-LSA aircraft have ever read or understood:

“I will build a car for the great multitude. It will be large enough for the family, but small enough for the individual to run and care for. It will be constructed of the best materials, by the best men to be hired, after the simplest designs that modern engineering can devise. But it will be so low in price that no man making a good salary will be unable to own one – and enjoy with his family the blessing of hours of pleasure in God’s great open spaces.”

Here is an odd, but important connection: Above is the most successful sailboat of all time, the Sunfish. No other boat in history even comes close to the numbers sold, the number of people who learned to sail or the hours they enjoyed. It was not the fastest sailboat of its era, nor the best in any other way but one: It was affordable because it was a brilliant simple design that was mass producible. They went to molded fiberglass in 1960, eventually producing a quarter million boats. These boats produced millions of sailors, and a very strong and enduring sailing base in the US, complete with a lasting market for more advanced boats.

Aviation magazines are always highlighting the best fastest, most elaborate planes with a moronic argument that these will stimulate aviation by getting people interested. Perhaps after decades of  this fiction, we can dismiss it. You don’t build a pyramid by making the top block and expecting the base to appear under it. Lasting things are built from the foundation up. No person in sailing would make the foolish claim that the winner of the 1960 America’s cup, (which demonstrated itself as the most expensive and fastest sailboat ever) was important to sailing as the introduction of mass-produced Sunfish the same year. Yet this is the same argument we hear when the EAA puts a multimillion dollar TBM-850 turboprop on the cover of Sport Aviation.

What men like Leeon Davis well understood was that aviation needed a Model T, (or my example of a Sunfish) not another expensive high-end plane.  We didn’t get it, because in the short run greed wins, and you can make a lot more money producing things like Cirrus SR-22s, $300K C-172s, and $159K LSA planes with 912 engines. Davis made the argument that a real industrialist like a Ford, would understand that it is a 10 or 15 year plan, but it was an argument that was never going to sell to a corporate manager who’s bonus was based on quarterly income sheets.

Aviation, and American manufacturing are not going to be saved by people with the “profit today at any cost, global cheap labor” mentality.  When Steve Jobs, the founder of Apple died, TV journalists who know nothing of manufacturing, working people, and economics, mourned him as if we had lost one of the greatest lives ever, you had to wonder if they would have had as many good things to say covering the death of MLK or Lincoln.

Amid this outpouring of love for the ‘saint’ that provided their Ipads and phones, A sole rational voice pointed out that Steve Jobs was not to be revered or even thought of in the same category as Ford or our other industrialists. The difference was simple: Ford had eventually provided a million Americans with a job that paid $10,000/yr. Steve Jobs did nothing for working Americans, because his model was to make 10,000 investors into millionaires, and have all the products made in China by people working as virtual slaves in toxic factories. He never gave a damn if anyone here had a meaningful job, just as long they had enough pennies to buy an Iphone and play video games. Ford was not my idea of a humanitarian, but he comes out that way compared to  Steve Jobs who’s holy trinity was wealth, power and ego.

25 years later, I still think about mass producible aircraft. A big part of this is that I would like to live in a country where a great number of young people, check that…where people could get excited about ambitious and challenging things again, like learning to fly, and perhaps building their planes. The philosophy JKF was speaking of when he said:

“We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win.”

I like to think that a design like one of Davis’s could re-ignite such thinking. It betrays that I am an optimist at heart, and it is a clue why I detest people who choose to be relentlessly negative instead of taking any small positive action.

I read a book on current economics  where the author pointed out that economically, Americans in 2013 can be divided into two groups: The 15% that came through the last 4 years, saw the market hit 14,000 and had all their investments come back, and the 85% who were squeezed into selling off 401K’s, investments and taking on more debt. His point was just about understanding that recessions are polarizing. Hard to argue against. If there was ever a chance that a large industrialist would get interested in building an affordable plane for working people, it gets a lot more remote when those same working people just went further into debt to just cover the basics.

If you are in the first group, I am happy for you, it probably has a lot to do with how hard you work and how well you planned, and in many cases a bit of luck like your family staying healthy. If you are in the second group, and you have dreams in aviation, let me impress upon you the only thing you really need to understand: You can still do the things you dreamed of, but you will have to be more willing than ever to control the costs by doing more of the work yourself, choosing simpler, more pure designs, and being willing to learn more. You are going to have to be your own white knight on this. There will be people to offer assistance and a path, but you are going to have to take care of your own dreams. Make a plan, do not lie down while these fade.

Seen from this perspective, you can understand why 95% of the businesses in our industry are only aimed at the first group of people. They are the easy people to sell things to. If you are one of the 85% who have less money than 2008, our industry still wants your membership, they want your admission fee at airshows, and they would like you to call your congressman when their lobbyists friends are trying to keep O’Hare and LAX open for  the six seat light jets of celebrities, but they don’t really believe you are going to be anything more than a spectator in the system, a small source of revenue to them. They want you to just be happy reading about what other people are doing. Look at the magazines and compare then to 1960’s vintage ones, the difference is staggering.  You can not learn about Model T’s and Sunfish by reading the work of editors who only cover Duesneberg’s and Yachts. Even looking at it saps motivation.

This is not new. It is the exact same thing Bernard Pietenpol encountered in the first depression. Thankfully he was not cut out to be anyone’s line boy or spectator. He was in aviation to be in the Arena. I consider him the patron saint of flight for the working man. Not because of his designs, but because of his attitude. If you are waiting for things to change, they will not. You must do what Pietenpol did, and make them change. You need to seek out the 5% of the companies that still give a damn about aircraft being affordable for working people. You should isolate yourself from people magazines and settings that send you the message that your place is with the spectators. You must act on things, even when those around say you can’t, shouldn’t or don’t believe in you. You need to move forward, even when you have doubts yourself. There is nothing to be gained by quitting. anyone can do that at any time. All the rewards go to the builder who gets down to the work of making his own reality.-ww

*If anyone has a copy of, or knows where I can find “where is my dream plane,” I would like to buy it. The only one I know of is in the reference section of the Embry-Riddle library, and I would like to have a personal one.

Charles Poland Jr., An American of whom you could be proud.

Builders,

We forget important people too quickly these days. Charles Poland Jr. is a person who should not be forgotten, On the outside, his life story was that of a common man. Inside, he possessed an uncommon integrity and courage. It was these exact qualities which cost him his life. There are plenty of good people in our country, but extraordinary acts of selfless courage are not common, and it is well worth taking a few minutes to think of this man and consider the kind of human being he was.

If his name doesn’t ring a bell, let me refresh your memory. Six months ago, a psychopath in Alabama boarded the school bus this man was driving and demanded at gun point that he be given two children. Mr. Poland blocked the man and opened the emergency exit. He actually was acquainted with the gunman and knew how dangerous he was. Driving other people’s children to school is not considered a lucrative nor important job in a money driven society, but by all accounts, Mr.Poland took this task seriously. The only way that a psychopath was going to take a kid off his bus was over his dead body. For this exact sacrifice, the gunman got only one child, 21 got away.

You can read a few words on Mr. Poland’s life in this link to a NYT story:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/04/us/service-held-for-school-bus-driver-in-alabama.html

The FBI released information today on the resulting stand-off where the child was freed a week later. The FBI killed the psychopath in his bunker. Included in the information was tapes of things the gunman had said to hostage negotiators. The man was consumed with antigovernment venom, and had a long litany of complaints that he felt justified any act he wanted to take. His claims of government evil were stronger than anything I could remember hearing in the first 25 years of my life. Today, you can read and hear things just like it any time you like on the Internet.

Out of coincidence, one of my acquaintances on FB went on a giant tirade in capital letters today, predicting a “Nazi” takeover of America’s social institutions. I had just heard the FBI tapes of the gunman in the bunker, and let me say that the words on Facebook were essentially the same story.

The guy in the bunker was clearly mentally ill, and nothing in his life had really ever functioned. It isn’t an excuse, and I am okay with the FBI killing him. However, the guy with the same tune on Facebook is highly educated, owns a Mooney, travels in it, and does many things. He has many blessings, but you never hear that. I have no explanation.

On Easter I wrote this story: A thought on Easter…. contrasting the thankfulness of a homeless man with the ingratitude of some of the people I meet at airshows.  A few days ago, I wrote the story on little Balsa Planes. At the center of it is our local Cub Scout Master Greg. I made a joke about being afraid to decline to be the Pack’s guest. Here is the truth: I did it because I have enormous respect for Greg. He is tired, he works long hours, he has a child who needs a lifetime of special care, and yet he still is the Scout Master for one reason: These boys need one, and no one else was doing it. These are not kids from private schools and gated communities. These are kids who really need scouting. The depth of my respect for men like Greg is in direct contrast to anyone who is irate about issues, but the extent of their “actions” is to email a “forward” on the Internet. I do not know how Greg votes, what church he belongs to, nor any of the other things about him which extremists judge others by. It isn’t my business nor concern. Anyone can tell he is a man of values by his actions, a more reliable indicator than things people forward on Facebook.

On the way to Oshkosh this year, I am going to take a detour through Alabama, to pay a quiet visit to Mr. Poland’s town. I would like to go alone, park out of anyone’s way, and find a quiet spot to sit for a few hours. While I am there, I will think of Mr. Poland and his kind of Americans. I will ask the same question that Michener did at the end of The Bridges at Toko-ri….. “Where do we get such men?”  -ww.

Fun with Agkistrodon Piscivorus and Vern’s Aero-Trike

Builders,

We have had two unexpected visitors in the hangar lately, and as odd as this sounds, I feel kind of lucky about it. Agkistrodon Piscivorus is the Latin name for Water Moccasin. There are only four poisonous snakes in America, and this is one of them (Florida is the only state that has plenty of all four). In the past week we have had two in the hangar, an unpleasant experience to say the least.

588051

Above, Vern stands by our pond with a 42″ moccasin that I caught with a 20 gauge (2-3/4″ shell with #6 shot) last night at dark. This is big for a moccasin. World record is only 74″, and in 25 years in Florida, the biggest I have seen is about 50″. This size is plenty dangerous. Not often fatal to humans, they do cause lifelong damage by destroying pounds of tissue permanently at the bite location. They frequently kill medium and large dogs. I was closing the hangar door and found him 4 feet away, but this is not close at all.

Last week, Vern stepped on a 36″ moccasin in the doorway to the side of our hangar. It turned and bit right through his boot, injected his venom, but by a miracle, it soaked Vern’s sock, but failed to get his flesh! Vern is an experienced woodsman and a lifelong hunter, but even he needed to sit down for an hour and try to collect himself. For the past week, both of us have jumped out of our skin several times when an air hose or extension cord has brushed an ankle or foot. I was thankful I did not step on mine, and Vern felt a little charmed that he missed being bitten by 1/32nd of an inch.

Environmentalists can rest assured that moccasins are not endangered, there are enough of them in our neighborhood that they are now a trip and fall hazard. Right after I took the photo, Vern tossed him in the pond where he was promptly “re-cycled” by the very large alligator snapping turtle that lives there. He ate the last one also.

588037

For builders who had a chance to see Vern’s aero-trike (1/2 Lancair 320, 1/2 Geo Metro) at Corvair College and Sun n Fun, here is a shot of it driving down Route 17 at 65 mph. I drove it 25 miles the other day, and it handles much better than you might guess. Vern was plagued with computer issues on the Geo’s original EFI set-up. I called Jeron Smith, noted Geo expert at Raven Redrives, and he provided us with a distributor and carb set-up to ditch all the computer and EFI stuff. Worked like a charm. Simplified, the vehicle runs flawlessly. So much for complexity. It gets 50 mpg in mixed driving. Vern even has the A/C working now. He has slightly under $1,000 in the project, total.

When you take the time to learn how to use tools and create things with your own hands, you are freed from only having products made by corporations in factories, designed to suit groups of people who may be nothing like you. If you are willing to get your hands dirty, you can experience the joy of having machines your way. Picking from corporate offerings is not freedom of choice. Deciding what you want to make for yourself is.  -ww

Mail Sack, 5/30/13, Cowls, Balsa Planes , Stick and Rudder

Builders:

Here is a sample of the mail:

.

On the story about Cooling with J-3 style cowls. (Pietenpols, Cubs, Biplanes, etc)

Jeff Moores Corvair/Merlin builder/flyer from Newfoundland writes:

“Hi William, While flying over The Avalon Wilderness Reserve this evening and listening to the strong steady  beat of my Corvair I realized that I will soon have a year of flying with my engine. In spite of our poor weather most of the time and my full time job, I have almost 100 hours on it now. I have flown it in every month since last June. I’d like to make the point here for any current or would be builder that since the initial timing setup with a timing light and idle mixture adjustment of the Stromberg, I HAVE NOT HAD TO CHANGE OR ADJUST ANYTHING !!!! My engine is built exactly to the instructions and procedures in the manual. I’m using a Dan 5th bearing that was extremly easy to install with excellent instructions. (thank you Dan for designing and selling this.)

Aircraft carburetor, 100LL fuel, 5th bearing, manual and parts from the Corvair Authority, Williams’ help and advice, you can’t go wrong!! Jeff Moores Corvair/Merlin”

Piet builder Harlod Bickford writes:

“Hello William, The attached cooling article re: Garidner’s engine left me with two conclusions.for the side by side Piet our project has developed into. Namely use a cowl along the lines of the Wagabond and Zenith or the cooling fan as used on the stock Corvair, albeit about 25 lbs heavier. With one less thing to break and less weight the pressure cowl makes more sense. With a firewall height at about 30″ high and 38″ width there is lots of room to work with. Harold”

Pietenpol builder Mark Chouinard writes:

“William: The write up on Gardiner Mason’s engine issues was very informative.  I have printed it, as I have with many other writings in order to keep it in my “Corvair” binder for review at a later time.  That part that discusses detonation, the spring effect of the head studs and the type of damage this causes to the heads went a long way in describing the damage that I found when disassembling my core.  Once my heads were off, I found a quarter sized hole in the top of the #2 piston.  It was not completely punched out, but a hole none the less that was probably 3/4 punched.  Later in the conversion process, Joe at Moldex informed me that my crank had a crack at the #2 journal… what a bummer, but I’m sure glad they found it!  I had a local shop perform a magnaflux inspection on my crank just to see if it was worth sending to Moldex… they said it looked good.  Never again will I trust  the locals for anything other than degreasing dirty crap… they just don’t understand or don’t have the skills or don’t care or are dishonest or all of the above.  Not sure which and don’t care.  Once I found another crank I sent it directly to Joe… no need for any further waste of time.  Finally, when I received my heads back from Mark at Falcon, he had stamped one with “use .042” and the other with “use .052”… my assumption would be that he had to remove more material from one of the heads in order to resurface the gasket seats properly… likely the one that experienced detonation.  He did explain to me that the different thicknesses would balance the compression ratio between the cylinder banks.  This stuff is so much fun.  Like Gardiner, I am not a real motor head, but with all the lessons that have been learned by others I feel confident that I can do this properly and safely.  Thanks for your continuing support and education… looking forward to Austin in 2014!- Mark Chouinard Owasso, Oklahoma “

Pietenpol pilot and 601 Builder Oscar Zuniga writes:

“Yes, I read the 16-page writeup on PietVair engine cooling and it was worth every moment it took to read it.  There is no need to wait for next month’s “Hints for Homebuilders”, there are a month’s worth of them in this article.  Some are subtle, but most are as plain as a “remove before flight” streamer is on a preflight inspection.  There is no need to wait for next month’s “I Learned From That”… it’s here.  “Tech Tips”?  It’s here.  “From The Cockpit”?  Yes.  “Parting Shot”?  Got it.  Color photos?  Illustrations?  Yes.  So this article is a full aviation magazine in one spot ;o)  All for the price of a full year’s subscription… same price as what I’ve paid William for every bit of advice, information, counsel, opinion, conversation, and honesty since I registered the Corvair conversion manual that I bought from Joa Harrison about twenty years ago.  Zero.  I think I’ll renew my subscription to Flycorvair.net.”

601XL Builder/flyer Andy Eliott (Phd aero engineer) Writes:

“OK, I read the article on Gardiner Mason’s Piet problems.  You will have to agree I know the theoretical part of aero.  Multiple times in the article, you state that mass flow rates scale with the square of the airspeed.  Unfortunately, this is not true.  If you look at a stream tube you can see (even from dimensional analysis) that m_dot units are mass/time.  rho is mass/length3.  A is length2. V is length/time. Surface cooling rates are a different story, but effectively are a nonlinear function of m_dot and delta_T, the time in which the air is in contact with the surface.  With equivalently good inlet, plenum and exit designs, two planes would comparatively cool simply as a function on m_dot.A small editing pass might be in order. -Andy”

Andy, you are the only guy to write in about this, and of course you are correct, mass flow is only doubled, it is dynamic pressure that is squared. I saw that when I put the story together, but couldn’t correct is as the original story is from our old website which is written in a computer language that only Grace and two guys a DARPA understand. The point I wanted everyone to take away was that small changes in forward airspeed make a big difference in cooling. Everyone who has flown enough with good CHT’s knows the effect of lowering the nose, picking up 10 mph and increasing the cooling at the same power setting. -ww  (Andy’s letter has an equation with it that may not show up on your computer.)

.

On the story about Fixing America is going to cost each of us $1.69

builder Doug Wright sends:

“William, This is one of the funniest things I have read in a while:

I told them that there were many reasons to use planes, but the best one of them all is just to have fun. When one of the kids asked if this was OK, I told him it was not just ok, I did it for a job. There was a lightbulb that went off in his mind, this was the first time he had heard you could evade becoming a grown up.

Just thought you might like to know it was appreciated.-Doug”

Doug, the story was popular, it had 1,000 page reads in the first 24 hours. Part of this was several people putting a link to it on face book. The tracking on our site also showed that It was picked up as far away as “GTT”, a web discussion group for people who appreciate and restore small tractors. I am glad it appealed to a wide variety of people.-ww

Dragonfly builder Guy Bowen writes:

“Fixing America is going to cost $1.69 is dead on. I was a huge fan of the Guillows products that were, at the time of my childhood, available at the local 7-eleven. Now a trip to the Hobby Lobby, Micheals, or the local RC shop is necessary to find these gems. I would add to that list my personal favorite: Model Rockets (although they were relatively more expensive). I preferred them over plastic models because they were dynamic…they did things that you could show your friends. I never realized that I was learning anything playing with these things until I ran into the kid down the block who was just amazed at the fact something that I built not only flew but I could explain how it worked! My youth was filled with kites, chemistry sets, telescopes, microscopes, electronic sets, rockets, planes, bikes and lawnmower engines. There is an unnamed layer that exists between the youth of today from the mechanisms that we use and it is growing more obfuscated as we become a more consumer-centric society. Black box engineering has become a more prevalent tool in production since processes and products have become more complex. Black box consumerism on the other hand, promotes apathy and laziness of the underlying nature of things so much to the point of disconnection. Just as I did not realize I was learning playing with balsa wood gliders and rockets…the inverse is true: consumers experience a loss of physical connection or fascination with the machines inner workings. The “wow” factor becomes focused on what machines do…not how they accomplish it. My 3 yr. old loves to work on machines with his old man while my 12 yr. stepson keeps his face buried in a video game and is more worried about fashion brand names that some girls his age…sad really, I wish I had more of his childhood back to show him the fascination of machines instead.”

Builder “Jacksno” writes:

” Your most fun post yet re Cub Scouts and Guillow planes.  Here you were preaching to the choir:  I was 19 in 1962, had been making model planes for 11 years.  First one I made was from 1 x 6′s in the garage.  Wanted to make a swept wing rocket/jet thingy.  No tools.  No dad.  But I had passion.  And a hammer.  And glue. I would not be refused:  I  beat on the boards full chat until I had an assortment of aerodynamic looking pieces.  glued that all up and painted it silver.  Put a stout cord on it and whirled it around my head like crazy.  Cord broke when the craft reached escape velocity – it did not land anywhere in our yard!  I had no idea there was an EAA, but I was on it in miniature from then on.  Oh, I did hack something together earlier out of balsa pieces with scimitar wings.  Talked my mother and grandmother into sending it to President Truman so he could kick some commie butt.  They did it and I got a nice letter from somebody up there, official white house stationery. No, I don’t know where it is.  Not my longhorn bull embossed ‘pearl’ handled colt .45s in matching holsters, either.  A little later I developed a modicum of craftsmanship and built hand launch gliders of solid balsa that would eventually get an stc for jetex 50s.  Fun days. Built every Monogram kit, some 2 or 3 times, had awesome Jim Walker folding wing rubber launched gliders, and the ‘P80′ type that cost .10 – all well modified and over powered.  Lookin’ to have some more (still flying gas and electric models) real time full size action before it’s all over! {;^) OK, OK, I know…I will calm down, be safe, build carefully and reliably under the expert and qualified eye of you and other real aviators, never ‘have’ to get there, never run scud…and I’ve read S & R often and will continue to.”

Kr2 builder/flyer Steve Makish writes:

“Hi William, read your post on balsa planes etc. Great stuff. My go cart when I  was a kid had a 2 hp Briggs and Stratton from my grandmothers washing machine,  yes it was a gas powered washing machine (outdoors of course) It actually had a  kick start ratchet device and was at about a 45% angle. It was the first motor I  ever souped up. took the head off and made a head gasket out of newspaper to  raise the compression (wow) I thought it doubled the hp because it ran so great. Regards Your friend Steve”

.

On the story about Greatest Book on Flying Ever Written, (Is your life worth $16?)

Pietenpol builder/flyer Kevin Purtee writes:

“You just can’t beat Rod Machado…”

Builders: One of the things I ‘like’ about Kevin is that you can never tell when he is kidding. He is a tough guy so you never really want to offend him on the chance he isn’t kidding. He also wrote me to say that he is a Celine Dion fan…..-ww.

Parting Shot, on the topic of   Built by William Wynne? Built according to The Manual?  from 601XLB builder/flyer Dr. Gary Ray,

“An advantage of the Corvair Engine that builders don’t easily have with any other engine is the ease, short turn around time, and low expense to do a complete disassembly and rebuild.  For this reason, it would make sense that all purchased engines (not directly built by the end-user) be taken down for inspection and rebuilt before flight.  This is the only way to know if any variation exists with accepted practices stated in your manual.  The new owners knowledge is now at the hands-on level of understanding.  This is a small price to pay for safer operation and it deals with a major portion of any future liability issue.  If I ever sell my aircraft, this will be part of the contract.”